← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Domestic Homicide Sentencing Review

30 November 2022

Lead MP

Rachel Maclean
Redditch
Con

Responding Minister

Not recorded

Tags

Justice & Courts
Word Count: 6655
Other Contributors: 3

At a Glance

Rachel Maclean raised concerns about domestic homicide sentencing review in Westminster Hall. Response awaited from government.

Key Requests to Government:

The hon. Member asks the Government to publish the Clare Wade review and respond to its recommendations swiftly. She enquires about specific actions regarding premeditation issues, rough sex as a defence, and training provisions for those involved in the criminal justice process. The hon. Member also requests consideration of her colleague's private Member's Bill that seeks to amend sentencing codes.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Redditch
Opened the debate
The hon. Member is concerned about the sentencing disparity in domestic homicide cases, particularly highlighting that sentences for male perpetrators are often seen as insufficiently reflective of the severity and impact of their crimes on victims and families. She mentions specific cases such as Poppy Devey Waterhouse and Ellie Gould's killers receiving comparatively lighter sentences than what would be given if a weapon was taken to another location. The hon. Member also notes that overkill is overlooked in sentencing, adding trauma for bereaved family members.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.