← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Infected Blood Inquiry and Compensation Framework

24 November 2022

Lead MP

Diana R. Johnson
Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
Lab

Responding Minister

Alex Burghart

Tags

NHSEmploymentNorthern IrelandForeign Affairs
Word Count: 13462
Other Contributors: 15

At a Glance

Diana R. Johnson raised concerns about infected blood inquiry and compensation framework in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The MP asks the Government to pledge full implementation of the infected blood inquiry recommendations, confirm the date for publishing the government's response to Sir Robert Francis' study, and prepare a compensation framework promptly. The Minister is also asked to ensure that affected individuals are involved in setting up the compensation process and address gaps in current financial assistance frameworks. Ms Greenwood urged the Government to publish their full response to Sir Robert Francis's report on the compensation framework as swiftly as possible. She also questioned when interim payments of at least £100,000 would be made available to those affected and bereaved partners registered with UK infected blood support schemes.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
Opened the debate
The MP is concerned about the ongoing effects of the contaminated blood scandal on individuals, their families, and communities. Over 3,000 people have died as a result of being infected with hepatitis C or HIV through NHS treatment, and one person still dies every four days. The lack of contrition from NHS leaders and the Department of Health and Social Care has turned a disaster into a scandal. Ms Greenwood highlighted the case of one of her constituents who contracted hepatitis C from contaminated blood products in the 1970s and 1980s. Despite being officially recognised as a victim, the constituent faced a long, challenging process due to lost medical records and stigma associated with hepatitis C. The strain on the constituent's health and emotional well-being, along with the impact on her family, has been significant.

Government Response

Alex Burghart
Government Response
It is a pleasure to be able to speak in this extremely important debate, Dame Angela. I say to the hon. Member for Vauxhall (Florence Eshalomi), who speaks from the Labour Front Bench, that the Government absolutely hear loud and clear what has been said today. Although I am just a few weeks into the job, I have been enormously struck by the sheer weight of grief and experience that has led us to this point today and will lead us to our final destination, hopefully next year. I pay tribute to the family members, sufferers, carers, and friends affected by infected blood. The Government commissioned Sir Robert Francis QC to produce an independent study on compensation options for those affected by infected blood. His report was published in June 2022, and following his evidence, Sir Brian Langstaff recommended interim payments of £100,000 to be made by the end of October to all registered individuals, which were successfully completed. Sir Robert's study will inform the final compensation recommendations expected next year. The Government is preparing options for broader compensation based on Sir Brian's findings and aims to respond swiftly after the inquiry concludes its work in mid-2023. I emphasise that interim payments are just the start, with much more work to be done. Regarding backdating payments for Northern Ireland, I will write to the hon. Member for Foyle (Colum Eastwood) as soon as possible after consulting colleagues from relevant departments.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.