← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Conflict in Ethiopia

16 November 2022

Lead MP

Rosie Duffield
Canterbury
Ind

Responding Minister

Andrew Mitchell

Tags

Foreign Affairs
Word Count: 8813
Other Contributors: 9

At a Glance

Rosie Duffield raised concerns about conflict in ethiopia in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

What actions are being taken by our Government to ensure peace is maintained and agreements adhered to through direct interventions with the Ethiopian Government or via the UN?

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Canterbury
Opened the debate
An estimated 600,000 people have lost their lives, some 875,000 are refugees, and 90% of Tigray's population are now dependent on food aid. The ceasefire is welcomed but there continue to be reports of conflict in northern Ethiopia, including looting and drone attacks, with Eritrean troops defying the ceasefire. Sexual violence and human rights atrocities have been widespread, verified by Amnesty International and the UN councils.

Government Response

Andrew Mitchell
Government Response
Thanked the hon. Member for Canterbury for securing the debate, acknowledged contributions from other MPs and right hon. Members, expressed hope for peace following a recent agreement between Ethiopian Government and TPLF, highlighted humanitarian aid needs in Tigray, discussed drought impact on Ethiopia's population (24 million affected), emphasized need for Eritrean forces to withdraw from Tigray, detailed UK's £90 million humanitarian assistance provided over 18 months, committed support for transitional justice policy, reiterated call for accountability of human rights abuses, noted UK's role in fostering peace and prosperity.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.