Ellie Reeves highlighted the issue of parental responsibility for convicted murderers, emphasizing how it exacerbates trauma for children who lose their mothers to domestic violence. She cited statistics such as two women being killed by partners or former partners each week and noted that perpetrators often retain parental rights even after a life sentence. Reeves called for Jade's law to automatically suspend parental responsibility without requiring families to prove otherwise through lengthy legal battles.

Ms McCarthy highlighted the lack of legal mechanisms to ensure child safety when a parent is convicted of serious offences. She noted that retaining parental responsibility can enable perpetrators to exert control over their victims and children, even while in prison. The charity Children Heard and Seen supports carers looking after children affected by interparental homicide or domestic abuse. Ms McCarthy stressed the need for more data on how many children have a parent in prison and called for changes in laws around parental responsibility. Children Heard and Seen advocates for prioritising children over prisoners, differing from previous strategies focused on reducing imprisonment for women with young children.

He thanked the Chair for his powerful speech and questioned whether 're-victimisation' accurately describes what would happen to a family if certain measures were not put in place. He further inquired about the details of implementing such measures, asking if it would resemble a parole board process or involve additional legal procedures. Mr Roberts expressed concern over the rights of perpetrators in cases where a victim has been murdered, particularly when there are children involved. He highlighted that after Russell Marsh's conviction for murdering Jade Ward, her sons were still under his parental responsibility despite the severe nature of the crime. Mr Roberts cited 67 murders per year by partners or ex-partners in England and Wales as an estimate where parental responsibility could be a factor. He argued that suspending parental rights should be automatic at the date of conviction for murderers. Rob Roberts intervened, encouraging the Government Minister to reconsider their stance on committing to legislation that addresses the issue of parental rights for convicted murderers. Asks if there is a mechanism to consult judges about automatically suspending parental responsibility as part of the sentencing process for serious offences.

She expressed her own personal experience of raising a child on her own and agreed that the current system fails to prioritize the child's needs over other considerations. Ms Atherton highlighted the support for a petition on parental responsibility, noting that while current laws allow courts to lift parental responsibility, the process is lengthy and expensive. She expressed concern about the difficulties faced by family members trying to obtain special guardianship orders, which can cost thousands of pounds and are often obstructed by parents' consent requirements. Requests information regarding a pilot unit in Wales for women's residential centre focusing on families and parenting skills upon release.

She mentioned a similar case from her constituency involving parental rights for someone convicted of sexual offences and highlighted the cross-party nature of this issue, praising previous Minister Lucy Frazer's support.