← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Agriculture in Sussex

25 October 2022

Lead MP

Caroline Ansell
Eastbourne
Con

Responding Minister

Mark Spencer

Tags

TaxationClimateAgriculture & Rural Affairs
Word Count: 8184
Other Contributors: 3

At a Glance

Caroline Ansell raised concerns about agriculture in sussex in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Ms Ansell asked the Government to assess whether farmers managing permanent pasture or land with SHINE features can access SFI payments effectively. She also requested information on further steps being taken to address the decline of small abattoirs in Sussex and a review of payment rates under SFI considering inflation. Caulfield asked for discussions between Ministers in other Departments to support the fertiliser sector and increase domestic production. She also requested improvements to rules and regulations around slurry storage and support for agricultural workers on visa matters. Additionally, she called for a review of the avian flu compensation scheme to provide quicker assessments and financial assistance that covers all birds lost due to infection.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Eastbourne
Opened the debate
Ms Ansell highlighted the significant agricultural sector in East Sussex despite it representing only 2% of England's farmed area. She mentioned that tenanted land makes up 48% of all farmed land, and raised concerns about the Environmental Land Management Scheme (ELMS) and its unclear standards and guidance which are necessary for farmers to transition from the Basic Payment Scheme. She also discussed the vulnerability of local abattoirs and their impact on direct marketing initiatives by farmers. Additionally, she addressed issues related to rural crime involving dog attacks on livestock, noting significant financial costs and distress. Maria Caulfield raised four key areas of concern for farmers. The first is the cost of food production, particularly fertiliser costs which have increased by 152% since May 2021. She highlighted that only 40% of fertiliser is produced domestically and access to it has become more difficult due to international export restrictions. Additionally, there are concerns about the lack of domestic fertiliser production and the impracticality of current regulations on slurry storage. The second area is the Environmental Land Management Scheme (ELMS), where only two parts of the scheme are open despite 84% of farmers wanting to participate. Caulfield also discussed labour shortages in farming, suggesting that expanding the temporary worker visa to two years and listing agricultural workers as a shortage occupation would help. Lastly, she addressed the issue of avian flu, noting its unprecedented scale and impact on poultry farmers, with compensation delays exacerbating financial losses.

Government Response

Mark Spencer
Government Response
Addressed concerns about food security, environmental benefits, simplifying schemes like ELM to encourage farmer participation, engaging with abattoirs while maintaining meat safety standards, addressing rural crime including dog attacks on livestock, supporting fertiliser production through BEIS engagement, and avian flu management. Emphasised biosecurity measures and the role of vaccination in poultry sectors. Highlighted opportunities for agritech innovation and education initiatives to diversify into sectors like vineyards in Sussex.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.