← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
FIFA World Cup 2022
20 October 2022
Lead MP
Alun Cairns
Vale of Glamorgan
Con
Responding Minister
Jesse Norman
Tags
NHSEconomyForeign AffairsBenefits & WelfareMental Health
Word Count: 6561
Other Contributors: 4
At a Glance
Alun Cairns raised concerns about fifa world cup 2022 in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
I ask the Government to provide further information on cost details for accommodation and alcohol consumption at the World Cup in Qatar. It is also crucial that there is clear communication regarding policing strategies to ensure a safe environment for all attendees, particularly for those with specific cultural or health considerations.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
I am concerned about the challenges faced by fans attending the FIFA World Cup in Qatar, including issues related to accommodation costs, alcohol consumption regulations, and policing practices. The cost of alcohol and accommodation is a significant concern for many attendees, and there are sensitivities around public displays of affection and LGBTQ+ rights due to cultural differences. Additionally, I have raised questions about mental health support for fans during the tournament.
Southgate and Wood Green
Mr Charalambous expressed concerns about the deaths of construction workers in Qatar, highlighting that 6,500 migrant workers have died since 2010. He raised issues regarding the kafala system, delayed salaries, barriers to justice, and prohibitions against trade unions for migrant workers. He acknowledged improvements made by Qatar but stressed ongoing concerns about implementation and worker rights beyond construction in other sectors like hospitality. Mr Charalambous also addressed LGBTQ+ safety during the World cup, urging the Foreign Office to ensure their protection.
David Mundell
Con
Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale
He declared his entry on the Register of Members' Financial Interests and argued that hosting the World Cup in Qatar was an opportunity to improve LGBT+ issues there. He also pointed out that homophobia remains a significant issue within professional football in the UK. Highlights serious issues within professional football in the United Kingdom regarding acceptance of LGBT+ individuals. Emphasises that there are broader issues beyond just the situation in Qatar. When he travelled to Qatar with Sir David Amess, David Mundell highlighted that Sir David was at the forefront of raising issues related to LGBT+ rights and the Guardian article's concerns. He emphasized the need for critical dialogue rather than sweeping problems under the carpet.
Grahame Morris
Lab
Easington
I pay tribute to my right hon. Friend the Member for Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale (David Mundell) and highlight the importance of UK sport in recognizing diversity among players.
She highlighted mental health as an important consideration for those attending the World Cup and asked about the support available for individuals with mental health difficulties, suggesting that understanding of these issues is progressing globally including in Qatar.
Government Response
Jesse Norman
Government Response
Praised the work of Sir David Amess and his advocacy for UK-Qatar relations. Acknowledged the concerns raised in the debate, including treatment of LGBT+ people, mental health issues, alcohol pricing, public displays of affection, and fan support. Emphasised safety and security measures for British nationals travelling to Qatar, including close co-operation with Qatari authorities, police engagement, military capabilities, and consular assistance. Discussed the importance of respecting individual rights, workers' rights, and trade opportunities. Highlighted the World Cup's potential to strengthen bilateral relations and showcase UK offerings.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.