← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Transport in Nottinghamshire — [Sir George Howarth in the Chair]
19 October 2022
Lead MP
Tom Randall
Responding Minister
Katherine Fletcher
Tags
EconomyTransportBenefits & WelfareLocal Government
Word Count: 12393
Other Contributors: 5
At a Glance
Tom Randall raised concerns about transport in nottinghamshire — [sir george howarth in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The hon. Member asks the Minister to confirm that the Government remains committed to delivering the integrated rail plan, including electrification of the midland main line, and ensuring Northern Powerhouse Rail does not affect plans for Nottinghamshire. He also requests a quick determination on proposals from Midlands Connect and support for a strategic outline business case for a fourth Trent crossing.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
The hon. Member for Gedling is concerned about the gap in transport infrastructure spending in the East Midlands, which received only 64.7% of the UK average in 2020-21. This deficit amounts to a potential £1.26 billion annually that could be spent on transport if funded at national levels. Additionally, there are issues with rail services not running late enough for commuters and the vulnerability of traffic systems due to bridge closures. The hon. Member also highlights the importance of connectivity in supporting new economic initiatives such as the East Midlands freeport and the world's first fusion energy power plant near Retford.
Ben Bradley
Con
Arnhem and Wetherby
Discussed local transport issues in Mansfield, including the Robin Hood line and the Sainsbury's junction on the A60. Called for funding opportunities to revisit pinch point projects and addressed highways maintenance, bus services, and regional transportation strategies. I clarified that I am the leader of Nottinghamshire County Council and would not be associated with some challenging issues in the city. I thanked the Government for providing funding to save bus routes across our constituencies, including those by Stagecoach and Trentbarton, which had planned closures due to financial difficulties. The funding has ensured these routes remain viable until April 2023. Additionally, I expressed gratitude for the integrated rail plan that includes Toton, leading to a significant capacity funding grant for our development corporation. Stressed the significance of the devolution deal for forming a new combined authority with an elected Mayor to enhance transport integration across public transport areas in Nottinghamshire.
George Howarth
Lab
Washington and Sunderland West
Mr Howarth welcomed the Minister to their new position.
Lilian Greenwood
Lab
Nottingham South
I thank the hon. Gentleman for securing this debate and express concern about repeated promises of investment in east midlands transport that have not materialised, citing examples like the electrification of the Midland Main Line being promised then withdrawn. I also raise my hope for clear timescales on the completion of the electrification and HS2 link to the East Midlands. I am surprised to hear the hon. Member talk as if there were no investment in transport under the last Labour Government, noting that Nottingham City Council was able to create its tram lines during that period which have been expanded recently. She expresses concern about retiring before future improvements such as the electrification of the midland main line and HS2 are realised. We need certainty from the Government about investment in future transport projects, particularly after the HS2 station was relocated from Toton to East Midlands Parkway.
Ruth Edwards
Con
Rushcliffe
Welcomed the Minister and highlighted the need for reliable train services in Radcliffe-on-Trent, requesting more frequent trains and improved accessibility. Raised concerns about rural bus cuts affecting constituents' daily needs and called for a review of new ways to fund and deliver these services. Mentioned specific schemes such as the fourth Trent crossing and the junction access into the retail park, highlighting issues of congestion and economic opportunities through improved infrastructure.
Tan Dhesi
Lab
Slough
Dhesi criticised the Government's underfunding of transport in Nottinghamshire, citing chronic mismanagement and low public funding for the region. He pointed out that transport infrastructure spending was just 64.7% of the UK average in 2020-21, which could have been £1.26 billion more if funded properly. Dhesi questioned the Government's proposals for HS2 in the Midlands and sought clarity on Northern Powerhouse Rail links to the Midlands.
Government Response
Katherine Fletcher
Government Response
The Minister committed to significant investments in Nottinghamshire's transport sector including £38 million a year over 30 years for the east midlands investment fund, £24 million for the A614/A6097 corridor scheme, and £950 million annually for road maintenance. She highlighted progress on projects like the fourth Trent crossing, rural mobility funds, bus service improvement plans (BSIPs), and rail electrification. The Minister also addressed concerns about HS2, economic growth through freeports, and devolution deals to improve local governance over transport matters.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.