← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

NHS PPE Supply Chains: Forced Labour

14 July 2022

Lead MP

Jim Shannon
Strangford
DUP

Responding Minister

Maria Caulfield

Tags

NHSForeign AffairsBusiness & TradeStandards & Ethics
Word Count: 8463
Other Contributors: 2

At a Glance

Jim Shannon raised concerns about nhs ppe supply chains: forced labour in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Shannon asks the Minister to address what must be done next regarding supply chains beyond the NHS and ensure that UK procurement policies prevent modern slavery. He also requests information on discussions with the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) about implementing measures against human rights violations in Xinjiang.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Strangford
Opened the debate
Jim Shannon is concerned about the use of forced labour in Xinjiang for producing personal protective equipment (PPE) that entered NHS supply chains during the pandemic. He mentions that £150 million worth of PPE contracts were awarded to Chinese firms linked to forced labour abuses, including Winner Medical (£122M), China Meheco (£19M), and Sinopharm (£16.5M). Shannon also highlights long-standing issues such as mass forced labour, detention camps holding up to 2 million Uyghurs, torture, sterilisation, and organ harvesting.

Government Response

Maria Caulfield
Government Response
Acknowledged the importance of ensuring that NHS PPE supply chains are free from slavery or forced labour. Described steps taken, including a zero-tolerance approach and procurement practices adhering to good industry standards. Mentioned plans for secondary legislation under the Health and Care Act 2022 and the Procurement Bill to further regulate procurement practices. Highlighted ongoing work on supplier checks and supply chain visibility.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.