← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Dolphin and Whale Hunting: Faroe Islands

11 July 2022

Lead MP

John Nicolson
East Dunbartonshire
SNP

Responding Minister

Andrew Griffith

Tags

EconomyBrexitForeign AffairsBusiness & TradeAgriculture & Rural Affairs
Word Count: 7367
Other Contributors: 6

At a Glance

John Nicolson raised concerns about dolphin and whale hunting: faroe islands in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The UK Government should use its economic leverage to discourage this practice by threatening trade sanctions if the hunts continue. The petition advocates using our levers of power more effectively to ensure that such brutality does not continue in the 21st century.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

East Dunbartonshire
Opened the debate
I am concerned about the hunting of dolphins and whales in the Faroe Islands, where over 1,400 white-sided dolphins were killed last year. This practice is not only illegal in many other countries but also unnecessary given the prosperity of the Faroe Islands. The method used to kill these mammals is particularly brutal, taking up to eight minutes for a dolphin and 13 minutes for a whale, involving paralysing spinal lances and knives.

Government Response

Andrew Griffith
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Christopher. I congratulate the mover of the motion, the hon. Member for Ochil and South Perthshire (John Nicolson). Promoting animal welfare is a key priority for this Government. This debate is about the best means to end whale and dolphin slaughter. We continue to utilise our existing trade agreements—those that have been negotiated in the past—to keep diplomatic channels with partners, such as the Faroe Islands, open. The hunts are cruel and unsustainable; almost 1,500 Atlantic white-sided dolphins were killed in one day last September, more than six times the number usually killed in an entire year. We will continue to make points ever more strongly further to this petition. No suspension of a trade agreement would end the practice; it will be ended only by the action of the Faroese Government themselves. The UK has agreed trade agreements with 70 countries, including rolling over the agreement that we were previously party to in our membership of the European Union. We have reformed these deals with these countries, which allows us to deepen our relationships because they become bilateral relationships. This gives us a greater ability to influence crucial issues such as animal welfare. The Government's position is that removing the deal—aside from the legality—would be counterproductive; we are fully exploiting all the different channels that our free trade agreement opens to us, strengthening diplomatic ties between our nations. We have managed to obtain groundbreaking animal welfare provisions in new agreements, including those with Australia and New Zealand, which include dedicated chapters on non-regression and working together to raise standards. The UK will continue to work internationally to protect whales and other cetacean species, playing a leading role in the International Whaling Commission (IWC). We are also playing a leading role internationally in protecting the ocean ahead of the conference of the parties on the United Nations convention on biological diversity. As an independent trading nation, the UK is leading the world in improving environmental, animal welfare and labour standards more than ever before. Through our diplomatic channels and our free trade agreements, we will continue to encourage reform and seek to replace cetacean hunting with new, better and more humane economic opportunities for the Faroese people.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.