← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

World Press Freedom Day

21 June 2022

Lead MP

Damian Collins
Folkestone and Hythe
Con

Responding Minister

Vicky Ford

Tags

UkraineCulture, Media & SportScience & Technology
Word Count: 12406
Other Contributors: 9

At a Glance

Damian Collins raised concerns about world press freedom day in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Government should consider new legislation regarding strategic lawsuits and introduce a proper register of people working for foreign governments but operating in the UK without declaring their interest. The Online Safety Bill should ensure that journalistic content from recognized news organizations has a right to be carried on platforms, protecting freedom of speech.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Folkestone and Hythe
Opened the debate
In the 21st century, speaking truth to power is increasingly dangerous. Eight journalists have been killed in Ukraine and eight others in Mexico this year. The work of journalists like Catherine Belton highlighting Russian oligarchs' activities has gained more attention due to the war in Ukraine. Journalists face suppression through strategic lawsuits and court abuse by wealthy individuals. Local news organizations are hollowed out, affecting both national and local media's ability to report.

Government Response

Vicky Ford
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Hollobone. Like other hon. Members, I will start by thanking my hon. Friend the Member for Folkestone and Hythe (Damian Collins) for securing this really important debate. Thriving independent journalism is one of the cornerstones of democracy but, as such, journalists are a common target for those who want to disrupt, disturb and devalue it. Reporters across the world are being intimidated, arrested or even killed, but now more than ever we need journalists to speak truth to power, to counter misinformation and to highlight wrongdoing. The UK is, as ever, a vocal champion of media freedom and of the journalists who do this important work. On 10 March, with our partners in the Media Freedom Coalition, we issued a statement condemning the brutal crackdown on independent media in Russia and calling on Russia to respect journalists' rights. We are giving the BBC World Service more than £4 million in emergency funding for its Ukrainian and Russian language services. In Afghanistan, we are concerned about the increasing restrictions on freedom of expression, including detentions and threats against journalists, human rights defenders and civil society activists. Since 2019, we co-founded the Media Freedom Coalition with Canada to speak out against attacks on media freedom and hold to account those who harm journalists. We have contributed £3 million over the past three years to the global media defence fund set up by UNESCO, which has supported more than 3,000 journalists, 490 lawyers and over 120 civil society organisations. The UK has given more than £500 million in the past five years to support independent journalism and the free flow of information across the world. We will be supporting the BBC World Service with more than £90 million per year over the next three years so that it can continue this work. To have any influence abroad, we also need to set an example at home. Since launching our national action plan for the safety of journalists over a year ago, the UK has risen nine places in the global press freedom index, to number 24 out of 180 countries. The new Online Safety Bill will create new protections for news publishers and journalistic content when shared online on other platforms. We are considering reforms to tackle SLAPPs that pose challenges to free speech and our legal system.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.