← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Inshore Fishing Fleet
14 June 2022
Lead MP
Anthony Mangnall
Responding Minister
Victoria Prentis
Tags
Northern IrelandAgriculture & Rural Affairs
Word Count: 14310
Other Contributors: 11
At a Glance
Anthony Mangnall raised concerns about inshore fishing fleet in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
Mr. Mangnall proposes repurposing the £100 million UK seafood fund to support green technology retrofits on vessels without match funding requirements. He also suggests amending the super-deduction scheme to help with vessel machinery retrofitting and upgrading to make it greener and more fuel-efficient.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Mr. Mangnall is concerned about the rising impact of fuel prices on UK fishing fleets, with estimates suggesting that two thirds of the fleet might not be able to cover operational costs and half could drop into negative operating profits under the worst-case scenario. He also highlights issues related to new Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) safety codes causing significant concern among fishermen, the spatial squeeze impacting historical fishing grounds, and the implementation of technology such as inshore vessel monitoring systems that may not be suitable for smaller vessels.
Chris Loder
Con
West Dorset
Chris Loder highlighted the challenges faced by small-scale fishermen in West Dorset, including rising fuel prices and increased bureaucratic burdens such as consultations and new regulations. He noted that fishers face a choice between attending meetings or going out to sea to earn money, causing significant fatigue and mental health concerns. Loder also pointed out the need for more flexible meeting schedules and representation for small fishing vessels in policy discussions.
Daniel Zeichner
Lab
Cambridge
The MP expressed concern about the intense pressure on people working in the inshore fleet due to boat inspections by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency. He cited a distressing case where an under-8 metre boat operator was banned from fishing, resulting in loss of income for his family. The MP also highlighted issues with overzealous enforcement and high inspection costs, suggesting these practices are making life difficult for fishermen. He further raised concerns about the catch app's accuracy, IVMS data collection methods, fuel costs, access to UK seafood fund, shellfish sector protection against sewage outflow, and spatial pressures from wind power developments.
David Drew
Lab
Gloucester
I am concerned about the future of inshore fishing communities across England and Wales, particularly those who are struggling due to lack of investment and support from the government.
Derek Thomas
Con
St Ives
Mr. Thomas highlighted the importance of the inshore fishing fleet to local communities and economies, mentioning issues such as excessive reporting requirements, inconsistent safety inspections, and concerns about vessel monitoring systems. He called for common sense approaches to data collection and maritime safety and suggested scrapping Inshore Fisheries Conservation Authorities (IFCAs) and quotas to allow sustainable fishing.
James Wild
Con
North West Norfolk
Fishing is an important part of King's Lynn heritage, but the recent closure of cockle fisheries by the Eastern IFCA has left local fishermen concerned about their livelihoods. The decision followed a survey finding that stocks did not meet the bird-food model threshold due to low spatfalls in 2019 and 2020. Redirecting to whelk or shrimp fisheries is also problematic as they are under pressure. James Wild highlights the need for better communication between fishermen, IFCA, and Natural England.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Jim Shannon discussed the financial viability of fishing in Portavogie, Kilkeel, and Annalong. He mentioned that vessel monitoring systems are beneficial but impose additional costs on smaller boats under 12 metres. Fuel expenses were highlighted as a major issue, with one fisherman spending £9,500 in fuel over four days. Shannon also raised the importance of balancing environmental protection with food security and sustainable fishing practices. Will the Minister give way on that point? The fuel relief scheme needs to be clarified for Northern Ireland, and information is needed about how many people there have applied for it. Prawn prices are high but profits are being swallowed by fuel costs.
Dwyfor Meirionnydd
She highlighted the importance of small fishing vessels in Wales, which make up over 92% of the Welsh fleet. She discussed the historical significance of fisheries in places like Nefyn and pointed out that only a fraction of fish caught in Welsh waters is landed by local Welsh vessels. Liz Saville-Roberts raised concerns about market conditions affecting fishermen, high fuel prices, and the inability to sell mussels and other bivalves to EU countries. She proposed solutions such as a rural fuel duty rebate scheme for Wales, infrastructure improvements, and identifying quotas within Wales.
Luke Pollard
Lab Co-op
Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Mr Pollard expressed concern about the compounding issues facing fishers, such as high fuel costs and inadequate technology. He highlighted that many fishermen are at a crisis point, with some on suicide watch due to economic pressures. He also raised concerns over the catch app's inadequacies and called for better integration of British-caught fish in local supermarkets to support local jobs and reduce carbon emissions.
Martin Docherty
SNP
West Dunbartonshire
Described the impact of Brexit on Scotland's inshore fishing communities, highlighting a 30% drop in seafood exports to the EU and difficulties with new paperwork and certification requirements. Mentioned challenges such as labour shortages, increased red tape, and loss of markets. Quoted Simon Macdonald regarding complications from Brexit and cited Hamish Macdonell's statistic about Scotland's predicted decline in salmon market share compared to Scandinavia.
Peter Aldous
Con
Woodford
Mr. Aldous highlighted the heavy regulatory burden on inshore fishermen, suggesting a need for a joined-up regulatory system and urging DEFRA to review the current framework. He also mentioned spiralling fuel costs making fishing financially non-viable and called for addressing these issues through repurposing the UK seafood fund. Additionally, he raised concerns about electromagnetic fields from offshore wind farms impacting traditional inshore grounds.
Sheryll Murray
Con
Rochford and Southend East
Ms Murray highlighted the importance of the inshore fishing fleet, sharing personal experiences from her time as a fisherman's wife. She raised concerns about the distribution of quotas and restrictions on non-UK fishing fleets accessing UK waters. Ms Murray also emphasised the need for improved collaboration between fishermen and scientists, better technology adaptation for small vessels, and the competition from offshore wind farms and marine protected areas. Defended fishermen against the suggestion that they could not accurately estimate their catch without professional training.
Government Response
Victoria Prentis
Government Response
Acknowledged the importance of cross-party consensus on inshore fishing fleet issues, thanked hon. Members for their contributions, discussed fuel costs and access to red diesel relief, talked about the seafood fund and retrofitting vessels, addressed concerns from Northern Ireland, outlined support measures for inshore fleet including quota allocation, established regional fisheries groups for engagement, planned consultations on protecting non-quota species, acknowledged MCA inspections as a source of stress but emphasized vessel safety, discussed IVMS and catch app uptake, and stressed the importance of data collection for decision-making.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.