← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Ports and Port Connectivity — [Christine Jardine in the Chair]
25 June 2026
Lead MP
Jayne Kirkham
Responding Minister
Keir Mather
Tags
Energy
Word Count: 11732
Other Contributors: 10
At a Glance
Jayne Kirkham raised concerns about ports and port connectivity — [christine jardine in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
Ms Jayne Kirkham asked the government to implement recommendations from previous reports to prioritize infrastructure improvements for port development and ensure public funding for road and rail links. She also requested targeted funding for clean energy industries and a coordinated approach across multiple departments to address revenue certainty issues for ports.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
Ms Jayne Kirkham expressed concern about the challenges facing ports such as Falmouth in securing funding for rail and grid connections, which are critical for their development. She highlighted that only 20 out of 58 British ports with rail connections actually use them actively, citing a need to reconnect Falmouth's inactive docks station track after 20 years. Additionally, she noted the issue of ports lacking grid capacity for electrification and decarbonisation efforts.
Christine Jardine
Lib Dem
Edinburgh West
The Chair requested that speeches be limited to around five minutes to accommodate all participants.
Darren Paffey
Con
Southampton Itchen
Ports handle 95% of Britain's physical trade, and the port of Southampton is a leading cruise turnaround port with £71 billion in annual value. However, the grid infrastructure outside the port gates limits its ability to fully utilise shore power technology, risking carbon emission reductions and competitiveness against European ports.
Wrexham
Noted concerns raised by Associated British Ports in Port Talbot regarding the current rail link's capacity and suggested that the Minister should assess whether upgrades or a new rail link are needed to support future industrial developments.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Jim Shannon highlighted the challenges faced by Northern Ireland's ports due to the Windsor framework, causing increased costs and administrative burdens for businesses trading between Great Britain and Northern Ireland. He cited a study indicating that 34% of firms have ceased trading with Northern Ireland because of these difficulties, while others reported having to travel as hauliers themselves to meet regulatory demands.
Martin Vickers
Con
Cleethorpes
The Member for Cleethorpes highlighted the significance of ports like Immingham and the Humber ports to local economies, noting that around 85% by weight of international freight traded with the UK moves by sea. He mentioned a recent decrease in total freight tonnage through major ports and emphasised the need for investment in energy and rail infrastructure to support growth.
Noah Law
Con
Bodmin
Asked the hon. Friend to outline how the vision for ports in Cornwall can link into broader industrial strategy zones and expressed hope that support from the Department for Transport will accelerate rail connection projects at Falmouth.
Olly Glover
LD
Norwich South
Emphasised the importance of ports for economic growth and highlighted issues with road versus rail freight connectivity. Called for railway electrification investment, specifically mentioning DP World's offer to electrify three miles at London Gateway for £20 million, proposing a £10 million Government match. Criticised Brexit bureaucracy and advocated closer ties with Europe.
Peter Dowd
Lab
Bootle
The Member for Bootle discussed Liverpool's port, its importance to local employment and economic growth, and highlighted the necessity of improving rail links. He also called on the Government to ensure National Highways provides funding to build a new bridge over the A5036 road to mitigate the impact of heavy traffic on communities.
East Thanet's port in Ramsgate is idle and neglected despite its historical significance. Port traffic has decreased by nearly 13% since Brexit, but the EU remains a significant partner for UK trade. The Government have taken some steps to support ports, such as a revised national policy statement and using the National Wealth Fund for industrial investment, yet there are limits to these measures. Ramsgate needs £20 million to reopen but the National Wealth Fund won't consider projects under £50 million.
Richard Holden
Con
Basildon and Billericay
He highlighted the economic importance of ports such as Tilbury and London Gateway, which support local employment. He noted a decrease in ships visiting major UK ports according to an Office for National Statistics bulletin, with freight tonnage down 3% at the start of the year compared to the previous year. Richard Holden also mentioned the Port of Aberdeen's 25% decline in oil and gas activity, stressing that ports are indicators of economic health. He emphasised the need for improved road infrastructure around major ports, mentioning projects like the lower Thames crossing and A666 upgrades.
Government Response
Keir Mather
Government Response
The Minister outlined the Government's commitment to supporting ports across the UK. He mentioned £6 billion of investment in ports since 2020 and a new maritime decarbonisation strategy focusing on climate commitments. He discussed plans for improved port connectivity through road and rail infrastructure projects, such as the third Road Investment Strategy with over £27 billion allocated and a 75% increase in rail freight by 2050. The Minister also addressed specific points raised during the debate.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.