← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Abuse of Customer-facing Workers

17 June 2026

Lead MP

Chris Evans
Islwyn
Lab

Responding Minister

Sarah Jones

Tags

Policing & ResourcesCrime & Law EnforcementEmployment
Word Count: 8833
Other Contributors: 12

At a Glance

Chris Evans raised concerns about abuse of customer-facing workers in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Minister should explain how success will be measured regarding new measures introduced by the Crime and Policing Act 2026, especially the decline in retail violence and abuse reported by the British Retail Consortium. The Government needs to support police forces effectively and prioritise retail crime to protect workers.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Islwyn
Opened the debate
The retail sector faces appalling levels of aggression, harassment and violence. According to the British Retail Consortium, 1,600 incidents occur daily in the UK, with 118 involving physical violence and 36 involving weapons. Workers fear for their safety at home after experiencing threats or attacks during work hours.

Government Response

Sarah Jones
Government Response
Acknowledged the importance of the debate on shop worker abuse and praised colleagues for their contributions. Stated that the new law sends a clear message against such behaviour. Highlighted a 30% rise in shop theft before the government's term but noted a 1% fall in the past year, indicating progress despite ongoing challenges. Announced £75 million funding for PoliceAI to tackle retail crime using AI technology and discussed plans to target prolific offenders through support services and stricter interventions like orders and tagging. Emphasised that if the provision proves effective, it may be extended to other workers such as transport or banking staff.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.