← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

National Accident Prevention Strategy

28 April 2026

Lead MP

Andrew Mitchell
Sutton Coldfield
Con

Responding Minister

Lilian Greenwood

Tags

Social CareEconomyEmploymentTransportAgriculture & Rural Affairs
Word Count: 7672
Other Contributors: 7

At a Glance

Andrew Mitchell raised concerns about national accident prevention strategy in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Mitchell called for a national accident prevention strategy led by the Cabinet Office to co-ordinate efforts across various departments. He requested that Becky Hickman and RoSPA produce a report outlining what such a strategy might look like, based on clear principles including ministerial leadership, focus on prevention, better data use, prioritizing those at risk, and sustained public education.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Sutton Coldfield
Opened the debate
Andrew Mitchell highlighted the growing crisis of preventable accidents in the UK, citing a significant rise in accidental death rates and hospital admissions. He noted that Birmingham experiences one of the highest numbers of accidental deaths annually, with over 550 families losing loved ones each year due to preventable accidents. Nationally, accidental death rates have increased by more than 40% over the past decade. Mitchell emphasized the human cost of these tragedies and the strain they place on healthcare services and the economy.

Government Response

Lilian Greenwood
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Dr Murrison. I thank the right hon. Member for Sutton Coldfield (Sir Andrew Mitchell) for securing this debate. I am pleased to respond on behalf of the Government. The Minister responsible for road safety acknowledged the impact of accidents and fatalities on individuals and their families, paying tribute to the right hon. Gentleman's efforts in raising awareness. She highlighted the multi-faceted nature of accident prevention across various sectors such as roads, housing, health, workplace safety, education, and product regulation. The Department for Transport published a new road safety strategy with ambitious targets to reduce fatalities by 65% and serious injuries by 70% for children by 2035. The Minister outlined several measures including consultations on minimum learning periods, lower drink-drive limits, mandatory eyesight testing, harnessing technology and data, strengthening enforcement, and implementing a national road safety board. She also addressed housing safety improvements through the decent homes standard, new fines for landlords with serious hazards, and actions on recommendations from the Grenfell inquiry report to build a more robust regulatory system. In health, falls technologies were highlighted as promising in reducing falls by up to 49% in care homes. The Employment Rights Act 2025 was mentioned as an upgrade to workers' rights, including statutory sick pay from day one and limits on non-disclosure agreements to promote learning instead of silencing incidents. The Minister also discussed workplace safety initiatives like public awareness campaigns for ladder and power tool use, and the importance of health and safety representatives in trade unions. She acknowledged the risks in agriculture and construction, particularly rural areas, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. Educational settings were addressed through food safety advice webpages and choking prevention measures. The Minister concluded by paying tribute to charities, volunteers, and campaigners involved in accident prevention, noting the human and economic costs highlighted by RoSPA's annual review.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.