Commons Sense

House of Commons · Westminster Hall

Leasehold Reform

03 June 2025 · 10 other contributors · 4,764 words

Opened by Ruth Cadbury Lab Brentford and Isleworth

Responding minister: Alex Norris

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Ruth Cadbury raised concerns about leasehold reform in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key points

  • Concerns raised about high service charges and unclear management contracts in leasehold properties
  • Government plans further consultations on various leasehold issues including insurance commissions and service charges
  • Commitment to introduce leasehold and commonhold reform Bill in the second half of the year

Key requests to Government

The Government needs to address the complex legalistic maze that many leaseholders are trapped in and work on fixing the current situation which allows for excessive service charges without clear value or transparency.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Ruth Cadbury Lab Brentford and Isleworth

Many constituents have faced issues such as high service charges, rising building insurance, safety problems, unclear management contracts, and a lack of communication from management companies and freeholders. The common theme is a lack of control over these issues.

Other contributors (10)
  • Norris agrees with Paffey's concerns and assures him of ongoing discussions and the need for transparency in service charges. He also mentions plans to consult on reforms related to managing agents.

  • Alistair Strathern Lab Hitchin

    Welcomes the pace shown by the Government but urges for more substantive solutions at pace, including relief measures for existing leaseholders.

  • Chris McDonald Lab Stockton North

    Updates the Minister on progress in Stockton North and highlights a lack of consumer choice due to market failure, leading people to enter into agreements with long-term negative consequences.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Highlighted issues with developers, management companies, estate agents, and solicitors not informing new homebuyers about leasehold agreements and additional costs.

  • Richard Holden Con Basildon and Billericay

    Asked about covering covenant issues under the freehold system, emphasizing the need for addressing unintended consequences of leasehold reforms.

  • Noah Law Lab St Austell and Newquay

    Suggests that allowing residents greater control over their estates can ensure better value for services they need.

  • Peter Prinsley Lab Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket

    Agreed that service charges are an outrage and there should be a guarantee for provided services, indicating the need for transparency in billing.

  • Sarah Dyke LD Glastonbury and Somerton

    Discussed the lack of transparency in leasehold management companies with a specific case in Wincanton where residents faced a 500% increase in charges without clear service delivery.

  • Tom Hayes Lab Bournemouth East

    Hayes discusses defrauded constituents suffering from unfair management companies and welcomes the Labour Government’s actions against rogue managing agents, asking for a clear message to these entities.

  • Will Stone Lab Swindon North

    Highlighted the issue of fleecehold, where residents pay astronomical fees without receiving corresponding services.

Government Response

Alex Norris

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government

Acknowledges the urgency of leasehold reform and outlines actions taken, including commencement of provisions in the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024. Plans further consultations on insurance commissions, service charges, litigation costs, valuation rates for enfranchisement premiums, and private estate management. A new era of commonhold as default tenure for new flats is committed to with a leasehold and commonhold reform Bill expected in the second half of the year.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy