Decriminalising Abortion

Served on the Women and Equalities Committee, highlighted how vulnerable women are disproportionately let down by the criminal justice system, noting 100 investigations since 2020 which is increasing.

Responded that they would discuss the matter at a later date after speaking to officials for details.

He questions whether Britain already has very liberal abortion laws, citing a poll by Savanta ComRes showing support among women for reducing the abortion time limit and banning sex-selective abortions.

Noted that many constituents support new clauses for decriminalising abortion, aligning with practices in other countries like France and Ireland.

Highlights statistics showing that one in three women will have an abortion at some point, emphasizing the need for reform of outdated laws that criminalise such actions.

The debate should focus on updating antiquated laws from a bygone era to protect women’s bodily autonomy, not changing eligibility for legal abortions. The current law is the harshest in the world and criminalises women who access healthcare.

She notes that Northern Ireland does not allow home abortions and that its context should be differentiated from the mainland's discussion on decriminalisation. Asked about the 43% increase in late-term abortions in New Zealand after decriminalisation. Agrees with Jim Shannon's point about protection for unborn lives under human rights laws. Intervenes to suggest that reinstating gestational age checks for abortion pills could be a solution, but is disagreed with by Alex Brewer. The hon. Member for Dumfries and Galloway sees this debate as an attack on those who advocate for the protection of life, valuing both lives in every pregnancy. Discussed the perspective that life is the most basic human right, citing statistics on abortions since 1967. She also mentioned concerns over medical complications from at-home abortion pills.

Emphasised the need for women's reproductive health choices without state interference, highlighting the rise in prosecutions and advocating for complete decriminalisation of abortion.

The shadow Minister emphasised the importance of maintaining a balanced approach to abortion law that respects individual rights and societal values.

Highlighted that more than 200 women have been investigated for abortion and criticised police tactics as traumatising. Supported decriminalisation to avoid such injustices. Argues against criminalising abortion, citing examples from the US where women face medical barriers due to legal restrictions. Acknowledges concerns about police tactics mirroring those in the US and raises worries about the escalation of such practices. The hon. Member for Rochdale supports safe access zones to protect the human rights of women who are seeking an abortion during one of the most vulnerable times in their lives.

He argues that the abortion legislation in Northern Ireland was imposed by Westminster without local input and against public opinion at the time of its introduction. Respects differing opinions but holds that every abortion is a tragedy for both the woman and the unborn child. Opposes further liberalisation of abortion laws on the grounds of international human rights, emphasizing that Northern Ireland's decision should have been respected. Silent prayer at abortion clinics is not disruptive; it is a personal act between individuals and their God.

Stressed the importance of compassion, choice, and bodily autonomy in the discussion on abortion criminalisation.

Acknowledges differences in views on abortion between Northern Ireland and Walthamstow, noting that there has been no call for reversal of the decriminalisation law in Northern Ireland.

She challenges the idea that only opinions can be held on decriminalisation, referring to evidence from Northern Ireland since 2019. She emphasises that decriminalising abortion does not affect current regulations that allow for abortions after 24 weeks in certain circumstances. Asked whether the Minister's officials have met with the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission to understand how the human rights framework operates in practice.

She points out that the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission has called for telemedicine to be made available, and the Government may face legal challenges if they do not comply. Supports decriminalisation but emphasizes that true decriminalisation means full repeal of abortion legislation, not just disapplication. Discusses the importance of human rights and the need to protect women from investigations and prosecutions. She recognises the points made by Dr Mullan but clarifies that in Northern Ireland, where abortion is regulated as healthcare without criminal underpinning, there would still be regulation and guidance about health services if decriminalisation were to occur.

Supports new clause 1 and emphasizes the importance of decriminalising abortion to protect women's rights and access to safe healthcare.

He questions whether decriminalising abortion could endanger women’s health if it allows for at-home abortions up to birth.

He questions whether individual autonomy trumps all else, suggesting a philosophical aspect to the debate on decriminalising abortion.

Paid tribute to the lead MP, thanked petitioners and supporters. Discussed how women can be criminally investigated for ending their own pregnancies, leading to dehumanising investigations and prolonged court dates, impacting victims of abuse or those in desperate circumstances. Asked Laura Pidcock about why more MPs have signed up to new clause 1 instead of her new clause, and highlighted the need for a meeting between both parties.

Thanked Gemma Clark, the petitioner, and highlighted the rise of abortion investigations and prosecutions despite their small number. Mentioned a case involving Sammy to illustrate victims being treated as suspects. Discussed the centrality of choice and individual autonomy versus the value of the unborn child's life.