House of Commons · Westminster Hall
12 March 2025 · 6 other contributors · 3,491 words
Opened by Tahir Ali Lab Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley
Responding minister: Mr Hamish Falconer
Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.
Tahir Ali raised concerns about kashmir: human rights and peace in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key points
Key requests to Government
The international community should take matters into its own hands and push for the implementation of a plebiscite as determined by United Nations Security Council resolution 47 in 1948. The UK Government should also inquire after political prisoners such as Khurram Parvez, Yasin Malik, and others.
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.
Opened the debate
In south Asia, the dispute over Jammu and Kashmir between India and Pakistan has caused significant human misery through wars and human rights violations. The international community's failure to implement a plebiscite has allowed the Indian Government to subject Kashmiris to unlawful killings, torture, and multiple human rights violations. More than 11,000 women have been subjected to sexual violence since January 1989, leading to lifelong trauma and distress.
Asked if the Labour Party can take a stronger stance on the issue of Kashmir, questioning whether the current view that it is solely between India and Pakistan should be reconsidered. Critiques the UK's selective approach to applying sanctions on India, questioning if this undermines Britain’s position internationally.
She agreed with her hon. Friend's speech and highlighted the need for the Minister to inquire after the wellbeing of Khurram Parvez, a human rights activist detained without trial.
He supported his hon. Friend’s case regarding the revocation of articles 370 and 35A in Kashmir by the Modi Government, which was seen as a direct contravention of international law. Welcomed the Government's call to end human rights abuses in Kashmir but asked for clarification on support for Security Council resolutions affirming the right of self-determination through a free and fair plebiscite. Asks the Minister to confirm that future trade deals will not be agreed at the expense of human rights in Kashmir.
He commended the hon. Member for securing the debate and stressed the importance of defending religious freedom against persecution, such as that faced by Ahmadiyya Muslims in Indian-administered Kashmir. Asked if the UK could act as an honest broker or mediator to bring parties together, suggesting ideas for solutions towards peace.
He commended his hon. Friend for securing today's debate and stressed that internet communications need to be restored in Kashmir so that local people can have their needs and views taken into account.
Raises concerns about Yasin Malik's trial in India, arguing it did not adhere to international standards for free and fair trials.
Government Response
Mr Hamish FalconerThe Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs
Emphasized that the UK's position is for India and Pakistan to find a lasting political resolution, taking into account Kashmiri wishes. Acknowledged human rights concerns in both Indian-administered Kashmir and Pakistan-administered Kashmir and encouraged states to ensure their laws align with international standards. Reaffirms the Government’s commitment to upholding international law, raising concerns about human rights violations directly with partner governments. Emphasises that trade deals are separate from discussions on human rights but can facilitate open dialogue.