Commons Sense

House of Commons · Westminster Hall

Financial Conduct Authority: Accountability

01 May 2024 · 4 other contributors · 3,852 words

Opened by Alistair Carmichael Lib Dem Orkney and Shetland

Responding minister: Bim Afolami

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Alistair Carmichael raised concerns about financial conduct authority: accountability in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key points

  • Financial Conduct Authority failed to act on warning signs in a Ponzi scheme, resulting in significant financial losses for victims.
  • Constituents faced high legal costs and were constrained by compensation limits set by the FCA.
  • Staff morale at the FCA is low, with many employees earning below the minimum living wage.

Key requests to Government

The Minister should address staff pay issues, cost of living adjustments, staff representation, outdated performance grading models, and the disability pay gap in correspondence.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Alistair Carmichael Lib Dem Orkney and Shetland

The FCA failed to act on warning signs in a Ponzi scheme case, leading to multiple victims losing hundreds of thousands of pounds. Constituents faced significant legal costs and compensation limits. Staff morale is poor, with many earning below the minimum living standard. The performance assessment framework is outdated and unfair, causing a toxic work environment.

Other contributors (4)
  • Chris Bryant Lab Rhondda

    Highlights parallels with Post Office cases where denial tactics are used, making it difficult for constituents to get justice. Emphasises the importance of financial services regulation for public trust.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Jim Shannon wholeheartedly endorses the concerns raised. He believes that the FCA is often perceived as a barrier rather than help for ordinary individuals, and calls for a significant change in how the FCA engages with constituents.

  • Nigel Adams Con Selby and Ainsty

    Agrees that the FCA is not working for anyone and expresses relief at the MP's presence to discuss these issues.

  • Wendy Chamberlain Lib Dem North East Fife

    My right hon. Friend is outlining a very concerning story. Wendy Chamberlain agrees that the Financial Conduct Authority's legislative authority for ensuring changes on access to cash deserves attention, as it affects communities' ability to access cash. Ms Chamberlain expressed concern about the impact of banks leaving towns and the need for larger financial institutions to be held accountable to ensure vulnerable communities have access to cash.

Government Response

Bim Afolami

It is a pleasure to be here. I thank the right hon. Member for Orkney and Shetland (Mr Carmichael) for raising this extremely important issue for debate. The Government agree that accountability for financial services regulators is of utmost importance, balancing independence with clear accountability, democratic input, and transparent oversight. The FCA is operationally independent but accountable to Parliament and the Treasury. Last summer, new secondary objectives were set to facilitate international competitiveness and economic growth while retaining protection of safety and soundness. The minister believes the FCA should rethink its 'naming and shaming' proposals. Regarding access to cash, the expected timeframe for the FCA's consultation on this issue is the third quarter of 2023. On the failure of Midas Financial Solutions, the FCA intervened in 2014 following intelligence related to the scheme, leading to compensation through the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and Mr Alistair Greig being charged with fraud. The minister emphasizes that it is vital for the FCA to continue robust enforcement against fraudulent activity and maintain high standards across all supervised firms using a risk-based approach. The FCA's accountability includes annual reports, regular data publication on performance, and scrutiny by Parliament through committees like the Treasury Committee and House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee. Despite multiple methods of accountability, streamlining is necessary to ensure effectiveness. Between December 2019 and March this year, the FCA provided oral evidence to Select Committees 36 times. The minister reassures that legislative frameworks balance independence with proper accountability and commits to monitoring the FCA's progress through upcoming reports.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy