Neonicotinoids and other Pesticides — [Gordon Henderson in the Chair]

He expressed sympathy with some of the points made but argued that annual authorisation is reasonable until viable alternatives to neonics are found. He used a medical analogy, suggesting that if a medication has unpleasant side effects but is the only option available at this moment, it should be prescribed despite wishing for better alternatives.

The MP highlighted the ongoing issue of neonicotinoids and their impact on bee populations, citing statistics such as a third of the UK bee population disappearing in the last decade. He emphasized the economic importance of bees, noting that approximately 75% of crop species require pollination and the value to the UK economy is estimated at £690 million. The MP also discussed the environmental impact on aquatic life and the need for alternative pest management strategies. I questioned the circumstances under which a derogation would not be granted, arguing that while tolerant varieties or alternatives exist, they come with economic costs and do not necessarily provide the same level of yield.

Duncan Baker raised concerns about human health impacts from pesticides, noting Norfolk County Council's ban on glyphosate as a positive move. He suggested the Government should support finding sustainable alternatives and rolling out such bans across the country. I am concerned about the impact of neonicotinoids on sugar beet production in my constituency. I argue that the derogation for non-flowering plants is necessary and safe, as it mitigates risks to pollinators.

I agree that debates about beekeeping and pesticide use are essential for raising awareness in the wider community about the importance of beekeeping for societal benefits.

I declare an interest as a neighbour of beekeepers and emphasise the importance of farmers being good stewards of the environment. I support the use of pesticides under strict conditions, especially in cases like sugar beet crops threatened by Virus Yellows disease, which can cause up to 80% crop losses.

Mr. Pollard is deeply concerned about the continued use of emergency authorisations for bee-killing pesticides in sugar beet crops, arguing that this practice contradicts expert advice and environmental protection efforts. He calls for transparency from the Government regarding their policy direction and alternatives to these pesticides. Additionally, he questions the impact of neonicotinoids on imported food and pet treatments, highlighting potential health risks for humans and wildlife. He supported Daniel Zeichner's comments and asked for clarity on the plan to address Cruiser SB's authorisation, including measures being taken and how progress can be scrutinised. He also inquired about exploring other uses of neonicotinoids in the wider economy.

A beekeeper herself, Sarah Dyke expressed concern about the Government's 'war on insects' as highlighted by the Somerset Beekeepers' Association. She called for rigorous testing of chemicals before approval and a clear target to reduce pesticide use in agriculture.