Commons Sense

House of Commons · Westminster Hall

Future of the UK Constitution and Devolution — [Yvonne Fovargue in the Chair]

08 March 2023 · 10 other contributors · 12,869 words

Opened by Bim Afolami Con Hitchin and Harpenden

Responding minister: Alex Burghart

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Bim Afolami raised concerns about future of the uk constitution and devolution — [yvonne fovargue in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key points

  • Concerns raised about strain on UK's constitutional arrangements in England due to varying local government structures.
  • MP asks government to regularise local government structures and establish clear relationships between local and central government.
  • MP suggests reforms to the House of Lords to allow more local leaders to participate ex officio and raise more revenue locally.

Key requests to Government

The MP asks the Government to regularise local government structures in England, establish clear relationships between local leaders and central Government, and consider reforms to the House of Lords that would allow more local leaders to participate ex officio. He also suggests raising more revenue locally for better accountability and economic performance.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Bim Afolami Con Hitchin and Harpenden

The MP is concerned about the strain on the UK's constitutional arrangements, particularly in England where local government structures vary widely. This leads to confusion among residents about who is responsible for what services and hinders economic growth by complicating investment decisions. The inconsistency of local governance systems also affects democratic accountability and regional balance.

Other contributors (10)
  • Alex Norris Lab Co-op Nottingham North

    Mr. Norris praised the debate's importance and agreed with the need for greater constitutional coherence, but not necessarily standardisation. He emphasized disagreements within parties are beneficial. He advocated for local leaders to have access to maximum powers and supported diverse local government models while ensuring equal power distribution. Mr. Norris highlighted issues of centralisation and the need for a fairer future with more community control over lives and opportunities.

  • Suggested that improving representation from other parts of England and the UK in the House of Lords could be a way to address current imbalances, particularly regarding bishops and hereditary peers.

  • James Grundy Con Blackpool North and Cleveleys

    James Grundy argued that a mayoral model is not suitable for non-city areas like Cheshire, citing the example of Lancashire where people feel it would be inappropriate to have one mayor representing diverse communities. He also discussed past controversies over devolution such as the creation of large unitary authorities and highlighted local infrastructure issues in his constituency as an illustration of why a mayoral model might not work. Explained the differences in wage structures across England due to varying responsibilities among local authorities, contrasting this with Scotland's uniform system of unitary authorities.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Jim Shannon emphasised the importance of the UK Union and devolution for Northern Ireland, highlighting his family's sacrifices in service to the Union. He advocated for a legal opinion on the Windsor framework agreement to ensure it respects the views of Unionists and does not undermine their position. Shannon stressed the need for Unionist representation at decision-making tables and called for devolution that includes full democratic participation.

  • Jonathan Edwards PC Carmarthen East and Dinefwr

    From a Welsh perspective, the Gordon Brown report was extremely unambitious. There is a huge opportunity for Labour to empower the Welsh Government with fiscal levers needed to deal with the Welsh economy.

  • Justin Madders Lab Ellesmere Port and Bromborough

    Mr. Madders advocates for devolution to strengthen democracy, highlighting distrust in the current system where decision-making is centralized. He criticizes the competitive bidding process required for devolution deals as neither fair nor transparent. Emphasizing his constituency's lack of a defined identity and economic activity dispersed across multiple towns and villages, he argues against the need for an elected Mayor for genuine empowerment of local communities.

  • Kirsty Blackman SNP Aberdeen North

    Asked for clarification on what regularisation should look like, referencing Scotland's system of unitary authorities and the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities for negotiations with the Government. Acknowledged the debate topic and praised her colleague for providing historical context. Highlighted the effectiveness of participatory budgeting in Scotland, where 1% of local authorities' budgets are spent by community members to improve their areas. Discussed improvements made through community asset transfers and the importance of paying councillors a reasonable salary to attract high-calibre leaders.

  • Mike Amesbury Lab Wirral West

    Business leaders in Cheshire and Warrington have echoed concerns about the lack of a devolution deal despite making a plea to Ministers.

  • Robin Millar Con Birmingham Selly Oak

    Robin Millar argued that the Union is not an idealistic framework to start from but rather a complex reality shaped by history, law, geography, and international relationships. He warned against turning the covenantal relationship between different parts of the UK into a transactional contract through devolution. Asked the Minister about unintended consequences of devolution, specifically mentioning the lack of uptake of tax-raising powers in Wales as an example of unevenness.

  • Samantha Dixon Lab Chester North and Neston

    Ms. Dixon's contribution is not detailed in this batch but she is mentioned as a former council leader sitting next to Mr. Madders, supporting the advocacy for genuine devolution and local empowerment. Ms Dixon discussed the potential benefits of devolution for Cheshire and Warrington, highlighting the region's economic base, net zero ambition, and collaborative governance model. She emphasised that a devolved Cheshire and Warrington could further progress its work on transforming transport networks, backing towns and rural communities, creating green jobs, and achieving net zero goals.

Government Response

Alex Burghart

Responded to a wide-ranging debate on UK constitution and devolution, acknowledging the history of the United Kingdom's constitutional structures and praising the role of devolution in fostering local representation. Stressed the importance of balancing central government authority with local autonomy and highlighted examples of successful collaboration between central and local authorities to create opportunities for communities. Addressed concerns about standardisation versus variation in devolution models by noting the flexibility provided through different shapes of 'cookie cutters'. Emphasised that section 35 has been used exceptionally rarely, demonstrating respect for the mechanisms of devolution across the UK.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy