Commons Sense

House of Commons · Westminster Hall

Supporting UK Artists and Culture

22 November 2022 · 10 other contributors · 9,604 words

Opened by Caroline Dinenage Con Gosport

Responding minister: Stuart Andrew

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Caroline Dinenage raised concerns about supporting uk artists and culture in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key points

  • The UK arts and creative industries employ 2.1 million people and contribute 116 billion to the economy annually.
  • Issues such as underfunding and a lack of strategy are hindering the potential of the creative sectors.
  • The government is encouraged to consider dedicated export hubs and a Smart fund proposal for supporting UK creators.

Key requests to Government

The lead MP asks the government to look again at the idea of dedicated British music or creative industry export hubs, support a strong copyright framework for royalties, and consider implementing a Smart fund proposal that could raise up to £300 million annually for creators in the UK.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Caroline Dinenage Con Gosport

The UK arts and creative industries employ 2.1 million people and contribute £116 billion to the economy annually, with exports worth more than £37.9 billion in 2019. Despite this, support for these sectors has not been adequate, with issues such as underfunding and a lack of strategy hindering their potential. There is also concern over the impact of funding cuts on organisations like English National Opera (ENO) that engage younger audiences.

Other contributors (10)
  • Barbara Keeley Lab Worsley and Eccles South

    Called for measures to support the arts, such as extending theatre tax relief. Criticised Arts Council England's funding decisions, highlighting cuts to English National Opera and Donmar Warehouse. Emphasised lack of consultation and political direction in decision-making.

  • Bob Neill Con Bexleyheath and Crayford

    Bob Neill criticised the Arts Council for proposing to move English National Opera (ENO), arguing it is effectively closure with no consultation. He stated that relocating ENO within three years is impossible, would result in job losses, and contradicts the Arts Council's goal of growing opera. ENO has produced notable British operatic talent and a diverse audience demographic.

  • Highlighted Cornwall's thriving creative arts scene, noting the significant contributions from institutions like Falmouth University and Hall for Cornwall. Urged continued government support for local cultural assets while acknowledging ongoing challenges such as low wages, affordable housing shortages, and skills gaps.

  • Florence Eshalomi Lab Co-op Vauxhall and Camberwell Green

    Praised the importance of arts and culture in transforming lives, particularly highlighting London's cultural sector and its impact on diverse communities. Questioned whether levelling down London's renowned cultural sector would help level up the rest of the country.

  • Harriet Harman Lab Camberwell and Peckham

    Ms Harman expressed concern about the Arts Council's decision to cut funding for the English National Opera at the Coliseum, leading to the loss of 300 jobs. She criticised the lack of consultation and misleading spin regarding the proposed relocation of ENO outside London. Ms Harman called for a strategic review of opera, four years of realistic funding for ENO, and five years for consultation on a new model.

  • James Morris LD Nest

    Asked for a better definition of 'levelling up' when it comes to opera, questioning the focus on location over education and perception.

  • John Nicolson SNP Glasgow North West

    The Scottish Government has provided additional funding for culture and heritage, but Scotland needs borrowing powers to address critical issues. The cultural sector faces a 7.1% drop in disposable income over the next two years due to Brexit's impact on revenue streams from EU audiences. John Nicolson calls for UK Government efforts at negotiation to mitigate these effects.

  • Kevin Brennan Lab Cardiff West

    Mr Brennan declared his interests in the Musicians' Union and PRS for Music. He expressed agreement with the hon. Member for Gosport, highlighting the importance of Cardiff's creative industries and arts to its economy and culture. He mentioned five key issues: the 'Let the Music Move' report on musicians touring in Europe post-Brexit; recent cuts by Arts Council England affecting cultural organisations; the Government's decision on artificial intelligence which gives tech companies unrestricted access to artists' work without compensation; the need for better artist payment through streaming platforms; and the upcoming UK Music diversity report. Mr Brennan intervened to note that the Welsh National Opera performs in Bristol.

  • Margaret Hodge Lab Barking

    Margaret Hodge, chair of Theatre Royal Stratford East, discussed the English National Opera's funding cuts and their impact on a unique facility in London. She argued that destroying excellence undermines levelling up efforts and congratulated ENO for collaborating with Theatre Royal Stratford East to engage young children from east London, securing an Olivier award. Ms Hodge agreed with the previous speaker that there is a misunderstanding about arts investment in London. She pointed out that national institutions like the British Museum should not be included, and the audience for London entertainment comes from the south-east where funding per capita is low.

  • Nickie Aiken Cons Cities of London and Westminster

    The MP highlighted the vibrant arts and culture sector in her constituency, including iconic venues such as Ronnie Scott's and the Royal Albert Hall. She expressed concern about the English National Opera's future due to funding cuts from Arts Council England and criticised the tight timeframe for decision-making without proper consultation with stakeholders. Aiken also stressed the economic importance of cultural events like theatres and pantomimes in driving local economies and job creation.

Government Response

Stuart Andrew

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Hollobone. I am glad to be here to discuss the Government's support for the arts and culture sector. My hon. Friend the Member for Gosport was instrumental in securing unprecedented cultural recovery funds during the pandemic. Around 5,000 organisations were supported through the cultural recovery fund alongside additional support such as self-employment income support scheme and the furlough scheme. The Budget also increased tax reliefs for theatres, orchestras, museums and galleries until 16 April 2024, worth almost a quarter of a billion pounds. Arts Council England is investing £446 million each year in arts and culture in England from 2023 to 2026, supporting 990 organisations across the whole of England—more than ever before and in more places than ever before—with 79% of the new portfolio delivering activity specifically for children and young people. The Arts Council is providing support to more organisations in more places due to a 20% increase in opportunities for children and young people, nearly three-fold increase in funding for libraries, and an increase of 21% in funding for accredited museums over three years. I am sure my hon. Friend the Member for Gosport will agree that stepping back and looking at the whole picture, it is exciting to see a portfolio that gives people right across the country more opportunities to access culture on their doorstop. The Department continues to work with Arts Council England and other partners like the Creative Industries Council to support growth in creative industries.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy