Commons Sense

House of Commons · Westminster Hall

Nuclear Fuel Manufacturing — [Mr Clive Betts in the Chair]

07 September 2021 · 9 other contributors · 12,304 words

Opened by Mark Menzies Con Fylde

Responding minister: Amanda Solloway

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Mark Menzies raised concerns about nuclear fuel manufacturing — [mr clive betts in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key points

  • Springfields nuclear fuel manufacturing plant in Fylde employs over 800 people directly and supports thousands more jobs through its supply chain.
  • The UK Government reaffirmed the strategic importance of maintaining sovereign fuel manufacturing capability and announced up to 385 million for next generation nuclear technologies.
  • A 46 million programme focusing on advanced fuels for small and modular reactors was highlighted as part of the Government's commitment to the levelling-up agenda.

Key requests to Government

The Government needs to affirm their backing for UK nuclear by approving proposals for new reactors like Sizewell C. They should also consider a regulatory framework and site proposals for future SMR projects, and hold meaningful discussions with EDF and US investors on manufacturing fuel in the United Kingdom.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Mark Menzies Con Fylde

Springfields nuclear fuel manufacturing plant in Fylde is the UK's only nuclear fuel manufacturing site, employing over 800 people directly and supporting thousands more jobs through its supply chain. With 70% of the site income related to advanced gas-cooled reactor fuel manufacture, a drop-off in demand due to early closure risks redundancies and loss of irreplaceable skills. The uncertainty around Dungeness B, Hinkley B, and Hunterston adds to the challenge.

Other contributors (9)
  • Alan Brown SNP Clydebank and Bearsden

    Mr Alan Brown questioned the strategic importance of nuclear energy in the UK, arguing that it is more expensive than other technologies like offshore wind. He highlighted market failures in the sector and expressed concerns over cost overruns at Hinkley Point C. He also raised doubts about the reliability and safety of EDF's projects, citing delays and safety issues in France and China. Mr Brown suggested a transition policy to support affected communities by diversifying into other energy sectors such as wave and tidal energy development. Asked about the timescale for small modular reactors and Sizewell C coming on stream. What does the Minister think is a realistic timescale for our Government agreeing a deal with EDF on Sizewell C?

  • Alan Whitehead Lab Southampton Testbourne

    Alan Whitehead congratulated the hon. Member for securing an important debate on Springfields nuclear fuels and highlighted its unique role in supporting UK's nuclear programme. He emphasised that Springfields provides crucial fuel components for various types of reactors, including future new builds like Hinkley C and Sizewell C. However, there is a potential gap between these projects and the current state of operations at Springfields, raising concerns about its viability.

  • Chris Bryant Lab Rhondda

    The right hon. Member made a powerful point about protecting Springfields as a strategic national asset, emphasising its importance for energy security and the workforce's readiness to take on new challenges.

  • Chris Green Con Blackpool North and Cleveleys

    Mr Green visited Springfields to advocate for nuclear energy as a key component of the UK's reliable, clean, and affordable energy supply. He highlighted the importance of supporting British manufacturing industry by ensuring stable energy production, especially crucial for industries like steel that rely on electricity. Mr Green emphasized the reliability concerns with renewable sources like wind and solar, advocating for more reliance on nuclear in the short term while also noting the potential role of hydrogen technology. He underscored the need to secure Springfields' future and retain skilled workers through partnerships with French industry and consistent government support. Asked about reliance on wind or solar for consistent energy supply during periods without sufficient wind or sunlight, questioning the viability of battery storage and carbon capture technologies.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    He expressed support for nuclear power, emphasizing the importance of pursuing green energy within cost constraints. He highlighted the economic and environmental benefits of nuclear fuel manufacturing, including job creation and carbon emission reduction, particularly referencing projects like Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C. Shannon also called for Northern Ireland's inclusion in the supply chain and asked the Minister to outline how this could be achieved.

  • Liz Saville-Roberts PC Dwyfor Meirionnydd

    I am concerned that the UK had to activate West Burton A and now relies on coal for 3% of electricity generation, which contradicts the Government's goal of phasing out coal by 2024. Additionally, Trawsfynydd in my constituency is recognised as a suitable site for SMR, and I welcome Mike Tynan's appointment to Cwmni Egino. The risk of losing skills related to nuclear fuels and generation must be addressed if we are serious about considering nuclear power.

  • Mark Hendrick Lab Co-op Preston

    Mr Hendrick congratulated the hon. Member for Fylde on securing this debate and highlighted the importance of nuclear fuel manufacturing to the UK's carbon-free future, particularly in Lancashire. He mentioned that Springfields, located near Preston, is facing uncertain times with potential redundancies threatening the industry's growth. Mr Hendrick also emphasized the role of universities and colleges in supporting the development of nuclear technology and skills, while acknowledging the need for international cooperation to address climate change. Inquired when carbon capture and storage would be done at a significant scale in the country.

  • Paul Maynard Con Wythenshawe and Sale East

    Paul Maynard highlighted the importance of Springfields plant in driving economic development post-war, praising its role in the nuclear industry. He expressed concern over uncertain intentions regarding the site's future and urged the Government to ensure continuity of skills base, suggesting a guarantee for UK fuels for UK reactors.

  • Richard Graham Con Gloucester

    Emphasised the need for consistent support of nuclear energy, highlighting its role in delivering low-carbon power and providing jobs. Discussed the importance of skill development through projects like Hinkley Point and Sizewell C, aiming to reduce dependence on foreign skills.

Government Response

Amanda Solloway

Reaffirmed the strategic importance of maintaining sovereign fuel manufacturing capability. Highlighted UK's leadership in nuclear fuel cycle with highly skilled workforce at Springfields and Capenhurst sites. Announced up to £385 million for next generation technologies, £46 million programme focusing on advanced fuels for small and modular reactors. Emphasised commitment to levelling-up agenda through high-skilled jobs across UK. Noted nearly 2,000 apprenticeships delivered over 70 years at Springfields site. Discussed the importance of developing fuel-manufacturing capabilities to support nuclear ambitions. Mentioned short-term challenges facing Springfields site and plans for redundancies. Stressed ongoing work with industry, trade unions via the nuclear fuel working group to secure industry's future.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy