Automatic Computer-based Decisions: Legal Status

Opened the debate

Mr Darren Jones is concerned about the legal status of automated computer-based decisions, citing issues such as miscarriages of justice resulting from flawed systems like the Post Office Horizon scandal. He mentions specific cases where sub-postmasters were wrongly imprisoned due to system errors and highlights that current laws are inadequate in ensuring accountability for these technological failures.

Government Response

I congratulate the Chair of the Select Committee on securing this important debate. The Government recognise that the dispute over Horizon, an accounting system used by post offices, has had a hugely damaging effect on the lives of postmasters and their families. In response to concerns raised about the treatment of postmasters, I acknowledge the need for legal clarity regarding automated decision-making systems. A group litigation claim was brought against the Post Office in 2017, which led to an apology from the Post Office and a settlement in December 2019. The Government are taking steps through an independent inquiry led by Sir Wyn Williams to understand what happened and ensure that lessons have been learned. In addition, substantial changes have been implemented regarding data ethics and transparency requirements for organisations processing personal data. Non-legislative tools such as the data ethics framework, guidelines on AI procurement, and the AI dynamic purchasing system are in place. The Regulatory Horizons Council is also monitoring new technological innovations to provide impartial advice on regulatory reform. While considering suggestions from Members of Parliament, including a referral to the Law Commission for addressing the legal status of algorithms in court, the Government are investigating whether faster methods can be used. I look forward to further discussions and seizing opportunities to benefit citizens around the world.