House of Commons · Westminster Hall
18 November 2020 · 5 other contributors · 4,554 words
Opened by Neil Coyle Lab Bermondsey and Old Southwark
Responding minister: Chris Philp
Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.
Neil Coyle raised concerns about asylum seekers and permission to work in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key points
Key requests to Government
I ask the Government to fast-track asylum seekers with health and social care backgrounds into jobs, increase the support rate to help protect families and communities during the pandemic, overhaul the shortage occupation list system, and lift the ban on work for asylum seekers after six months.
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.
Opened the debate
I am concerned about the Home Office's delay in reviewing the policy on asylum seekers and work, which has led to a record-breaking failure with over 17,000 applications waiting more than 12 months for an initial decision. The current system leaves people destitute at £5.66 per day and vulnerable to exploitation, while other countries allow quicker access to the workforce.
The hon. Gentleman notes that it is astonishing the Government are taking so long to review something that would benefit the economy, citing estimates of up to £42 million being contributed by people currently unable to work due to their skills and current living conditions. The MP questioned whether the Government would take into account that legally residing asylum seekers who have followed procedures cannot work and could otherwise make a societal contribution.
The hon. Gentleman acknowledges the importance of safe and legal routes for people to establish their claims, which can disrupt traffickers. He also points out that 67% of businesses believe it is time to lift the ban on asylum seekers working due to changed economic circumstances. The hon. Gentleman briefly mentions a quote from Jack Straw regarding cash benefits being seen as a pull factor for fraudulent claims by asylum seekers, suggesting that allowing asylum seekers to work could change public perception positively. The MP argued that the case for asylum seekers to work in Britain is robustly made. He cited historical reasons for restrictions on asylum seekers working but noted the current climate of Brexit, immigration changes, and economic challenges. The MP suggested it would be beneficial for the UK if people with valuable skills could contribute economically rather than being reliant on taxpayers.
The hon. Gentleman discusses a case in his constituency where Syrian families with skilled carpenters were hindered by language barriers and expresses the importance of encouraging asylum seekers to work when there is market demand.
The hon. Gentleman emphasises that Britain has a history of supporting refugees, stressing the need for respectful treatment and highlighting concerns over the Government's inaction following their role in establishing the hostile environment policy.
The hon. Gentleman is driven by compassion for asylum seekers but agrees that any policy changes could inadvertently benefit traffickers bringing economic migrants into the country through dangerous means, such as at sea or in lorries. The MP confirmed that refugee selection is handled by the UNHCR to ensure those in most need are chosen, preventing them from resorting to smugglers.
Government Response
Chris PhilpIt is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship. I congratulate Neil Coyle on securing the debate and note that migrants can make economic contributions through our points-based system, launching shortly. Emphasising existing safe routes such as work visas, family reunion rules for 7,500 people annually, and refugee resettlement for 25,000 individuals since 2015. Criticised those entering illegally, suggesting they are not the most in need but rather those who can afford to pay smugglers or forcefully cross borders. Stated that legal routes exist and must be respected; illegal entry undermines these systems. Mentioned that those arriving through family reunion or resettlement programmes can work immediately. Acknowledged the need to speed up asylum decision making, particularly due to pandemic challenges. Concerned about pull factors encouraging illegal entry if immediate employment is possible upon arrival. Highlighted shortage occupation list includes nurses and medical practitioners, among others.