← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Greyhound Racing

28 March 2022

Lead MP

Christina Rees
Neath
Lab

Responding Minister

Rebecca Pow

Tags

No tags
Word Count: 11180
Other Contributors: 6

At a Glance

Christina Rees raised concerns about greyhound racing in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The lead MP asks for a meeting with the Minister to discuss how the UK Government can progress the proposal to abolish greyhound racing through legislation, ensuring the welfare of redundant dogs is managed through an industry levy. She believes that increased regulation may offer temporary solutions but does not address the long-term welfare issues.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Neath
Opened the debate
The lead MP is concerned about the welfare of greyhounds in racing, noting that thousands of dogs suffer from injuries and endure harsh conditions on tracks. Annual data shows that over 4,800 greyhounds are injured each year, with hundreds euthanised annually due to humane or economic reasons. The dual system of GBGB-registered tracks and independent tracks does not adequately protect the animals, leading to continued suffering and neglect.

Government Response

Rebecca Pow
Government Response
The Government takes greyhound welfare seriously and believes improvements are necessary, but a ban on racing is not warranted. GBGB's national welfare strategy aims to improve greyhound welfare throughout their life, and bookmakers contribute 95% towards the voluntary greyhound levy. The minister highlighted that GBGB has published detailed figures on injuries and euthanisations since 2018 and that independent standards for trainers' kennels are being developed with welfare groups.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.