← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Midas Financial Solutions Collapse

22 March 2022

Lead MP

Alistair Carmichael
Orkney and Shetland
Lib Dem

Responding Minister

John Glen

Tags

Crime & Law EnforcementForeign Affairs
Word Count: 10213
Other Contributors: 3

At a Glance

Alistair Carmichael raised concerns about midas financial solutions collapse in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Financial Conduct Authority should address its unsatisfactory response by making ex gratia payments where appropriate, as it has done in other cases. The regulation of financial services needs urgent scrutiny and reform to better protect consumers and ensure that the complexities do not leave people vulnerable to fraud and out of pocket.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Orkney and Shetland
Opened the debate
The collapse of Midas Financial Solutions has left investors, including constituents who lost tens or hundreds of thousands of pounds, highly unsatisfied. Alistair Greig was convicted of fraud involving £13,281,671.25 and the case highlights issues with regulatory oversight by the FSA and FCA, including their failure to act on warnings from the Yorkshire Building Society in 2008 and 2012. The court's decision created a two-tier protection system for UK investors where those dealing directly with principals are better protected than those dealing with appointed representatives. This leaves consumers at risk if advisors operate outside their agreement, as happened in the Midas case. Investors took legal action against Sense Network Ltd and the FCA issued an apology but refused to compensate victims despite them being left £2 million out of pocket.

Government Response

John Glen
Government Response
It is a privilege to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Stringer, and I join others in congratulating the right hon. Member for Orkney and Shetland on securing today's debate. The minister acknowledged the role of his opposite number, the hon. Member for Hampstead and Kilburn, in championing her constituent's case over six years. He recognised that fraud damages trust between individuals and across society and is a priority for the Government, focusing on reducing vulnerabilities, catching criminals responsible, and supporting victims. He noted that Midas was founded by Mr Alistair Greig in 2006 and became an appointed representative of Sense Network Ltd in 2007, causing significant distress to individuals and families through fraudulent activities until halted by the FCA in 2014 when it included 279 members of the public who had paid £12.8 million and were owed a total of £13.6 million. The minister condemned Greig's actions unreservedly, stating that he was operating outside the authorised activities allowed under the appointed representative regime and hiding his fraudulent operation from Sense Network Ltd, which led to an FCA investigation and subsequent criminal charges resulting in 14 years imprisonment for Mr Greig in April 2020. The minister highlighted steps taken by the Treasury and FCA including a call for evidence on the regime as of December 3rd, aiming to improve public information about what activities appointed representatives are authorised to undertake. He explained that the Financial Services Compensation Scheme has paid out £9.6 million in compensation to 197 claimants by August 2020 and continues to accept claims against Midas. The FCA acknowledges prior failings of its predecessor, the FSA, in this case, and is undertaking a transformation programme to improve effectiveness. The minister concluded that the Government will continue working with regulators to protect consumers while allowing firms to operate.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.