← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Ukrainian Refugees
14 March 2022
Lead MP
Catherine McKinnell
Newcastle upon Tyne North
Lab
Responding Minister
Kevin Foster
Tags
ImmigrationMigrants & BordersUkraine
Word Count: 23009
Other Contributors: 15
At a Glance
Catherine McKinnell raised concerns about ukrainian refugees in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
Catherine McKinnell asks the Government to provide clarity on why they have taken a highly restrictive approach and to urgently coordinate systems and staff to run a humane admissions process. She also wants assurances that LGBT relatives and partners can get out of Ukraine safely without facing discriminatory barriers. I ask the Government to commit to introducing emergency protection visas for those fleeing Ukraine who want to reach the UK. Mr. Kinnock asks the Minister to correct the Prime Minister's claim that the UK has resettled more vulnerable people than any other European country since 2015, provide an indication of the expected application-to-arrival timescale for the community sponsorship scheme, and implement Labour's emergency protection visa.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The Government has put up barriers for Ukrainian refugees trying to enter the UK despite predictions of a refugee crisis and knowledge of Russia's aggressive stance. With over 2.8 million Ukrainians already fleeing their country, Catherine McKinnell highlighted the chaotic process and confusion faced by refugees in accessing the limited visa schemes available. She mentioned heartbreaking stories of families struggling to escape violence and harsh conditions such as sub-zero temperatures while waiting for visas. There are 530 Ukrainians living in Lewisham, and many face bureaucratic obstacles with the Ukraine family scheme. Visa application centres are overwhelmed, leading to waiting times of up to two weeks for appointments. My constituent's mother-in-law is experiencing a two-week wait for an appointment at a visa application centre in Poland, while another friend's daughter has been trapped in Poland due to delays. The Home Office needs to act urgently to address these issues. Mr. Kinnock is concerned about the Home Office's failure to effectively respond to the crisis in Ukraine, citing issues like the Windrush scandal and the small boats crisis. He notes that while the majority of Ukrainians wish to stay close to their country, some will seek refuge in the UK. Mr. Kinnock criticises the Home Office for accepting only 4,000 Ukrainian refugees out of 17,100 applications and highlights the excessive red tape and bureaucracy associated with visa processing, including delays of up to 398 days.
Andrew Slaughter
Lab
Hammersmith and Chiswick
I am concerned about the Home Office bureaucracy preventing Ukrainian refugees from entering the UK. My borough, which is one of the top 20 in the country for Ukrainian-born residents, has faced significant delays in processing refugee applications, similar to the issues seen with Afghan refugees last year. One constituent's email highlighted that his family member and her son are ill in Warsaw due to stress and lack of access to proper documentation and support from the UK visa application process. Inquired about accommodation options for families who do not have immediate offers of housing upon arrival in the UK.
Anne McLaughlin
SNP
Glasgow North West
Criticised the Nationality and Borders Bill, expressing worry that it would dissuade refugees from seeking asylum. Highlighted how other European countries have taken in more refugees per capita than the UK. Emphasized confusion caused by constantly changing rules regarding visas and passports for Ukrainians fleeing to the UK. Asked about the support for refugees placed with families and highlighted concerns over their ability to reach out for help.
Catherine West
Lab
Hornsey and Friern Barnet
Ms West highlighted the bureaucratic nightmare faced by Ukrainian refugees trying to enter the UK, citing the case of Marta who waited for 10 days despite her family's efforts. She criticized the lack of information on the Government's website and stressed that the situation is not an immigration process but a humanitarian crisis. Ms West also noted the need for a more efficient government response and called for a review to learn from previous crises, such as in Afghanistan. She urged the Minister to address the current mess and improve future responses. Requested information on the progress of the Afghanistan refugee scheme alongside inquiries into Ukraine's situation.
Daisy Cooper
Lib Dem
St Albans
Expressed concerns about the Home Office bureaucracy impacting Ukrainian refugees, citing examples of constituents waiting for weeks to receive visas despite being in urgent need. Highlighted instances where families have been traumatised and exhausted by bureaucratic procedures, with one 74-year-old woman forced to travel long distances and wait for approval emails, while another family faced delays due to visa processing issues. Asked about travel arrangements for individuals who have appointments but do not yet have their forms and those waiting for confirmation after applying.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
The MP thanked the hon. Member for Newcastle upon Tyne North and expressed frustration with the current system's inefficiency in processing refugees. He highlighted the large volume of petitions, emails, and letters urging the government to take action and praised the homes for Ukrainians scheme for enabling individuals, charities, community groups, and businesses to offer accommodation to Ukrainian refugees. The MP also addressed concerns about funding for healthcare, jobs, and education in Northern Ireland and encouraged simplification of the process so that people can connect with those who need assistance. Jim Shannon pointed out that during emergencies, individuals often do not have their passports or identification documents with them as they flee for safety. This makes it difficult to comply with standard bureaucratic requirements when seeking refuge. Acknowledged the Minister's response and requested further details via a written letter, emphasizing the need to quickly match refugees with job opportunities. Thanked the Minister for the Afghan scheme and inquired about when people from Afghanistan, who have been staying at the Marine Court hotel in North Down for seven months, will be able to move into jobs and accommodation.
Joanna Cherry
SNP
Edinburgh South West
Expressed concern about the UK Government's failure to match European Union generosity towards Ukrainian refugees. Highlighted moral and legal obligations, women's vulnerability in war, and the need for visa-free access as other countries have done. Asked for an apology and recognition of Edinburgh City Council's contribution to resettlement efforts, highlighting their success per capita in Scotland.
Margaret Ferrier
SNP
Renzig, North East Scotland
The Government's initial response to the refugee crisis from Ukraine has been underwhelming. Although they may have expanded their commitment somewhat, it is not enough and lacks clarity in terms of numbers of refugees eligible for various routes. Margaret Ferrier calls for an immediate provision of surge resources for officials dealing with the crisis effectively without undue stress on staff. She also criticises the lack of proactive planning and bespoke visa processes created weeks after a refugee crisis has already begun, which is inadequate.
Marion Fellows
SNP
North Lanarkshire
Marion Fellows expressed frustration over the prolonged visa application process for a UK national constituent with Ukrainian family members. She highlighted that despite continuous efforts, it took an extended period before her constituent's wife and daughters received visas. Fellows urged the government to address private firms profiting from the crisis and stressed the need for clearer guidance on helping refugees. Marion Fellows congratulated the Minister on handling a complex issue and noted North Lanarkshire's history of taking refugees from countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo, Syria, and Afghanistan without UK Government intervention since 1919.
Mick Whitley
Con
Cheltenham
Mr Whitley criticised the Government for refusing to lift visa requirements for Ukrainians fleeing from conflict, highlighting that Poland has welcomed over 1 million Ukrainians while the UK has only approved visas for 300. He expressed concern about the Home Secretary's statement regarding seasonal worker visas as a solution and urged the Minister to reflect on public sentiment and the treatment of refugees.
Munira Wilson
Lib Dem
Twickenham
A constituent's father who fled Ukraine is facing a 300 km journey to Warsaw to collect his visa, deemed unreasonable given his age and circumstances, urging on-site visa issuance.
Olivia Blake
Lab
Sheffield Hallam
Blake welcomed the Homes for Ukraine scheme but raised concerns about its adequacy and lack of support for local authorities. She urged for safeguarding assessments before placements and criticised the absence of a right to work and access to benefits. She highlighted the need for family reunion, more online application accessibility, and called for the abandonment of the Nationality and Borders Bill.
Phillip Jolliffe
Green
Brent North
Mr Jolliffe emphasised the necessity for the UK to open its borders to Ukrainian refugees, expressing personal concern for a friend who had volunteered and deployed with his unit while his wife and child remained in Kyiv.
Rachael Maskell
Lab Co-op
York Central
Ms Maskell expressed concern about the UK's delayed response to refugees and criticized the Home Office for its restrictive policies. She highlighted the bureaucratic hurdles that prevent families from being reunited quickly, such as the need for visas which are difficult to obtain due to conflict zones like Kyiv. She also questioned the sustainability of the Homes for Ukraine scheme beyond six months, including issues related to housing stability, school placements, and access to healthcare services. Rachael Maskell asked the Minister how long it would take for a family with no pre-existing connections in the UK to be placed through the Homes for Ukraine scheme.
Stephen Kinnock
Lab
Aberafan Maesteg
Noted that Labour-led councils are taking in significantly more refugees compared to Conservative-led councils. Also raised the issue of financial support from the Government towards local authorities.
Tulip Siddiq
Lab
Hampstead and Highgate
A constituent's friend from Ukraine was turned away at Calais due to lack of appointments for her seven-year-old son, highlighting the need for clarity on visa appointment requirements.
Government Response
Kevin Foster
Government Response
Discussed the government's position on Ukrainian refugees, stressing the necessity for security measures such as biometric checks. Announced the bespoke Ukraine family scheme which expands eligibility to bring in relatives of Ukrainians and ensures fee-free applications. Introduced a new sponsor group scheme allowing individuals with no UK ties to enter, aiming for expedited decision-making processes starting from Friday. Emphasized the uncapped nature of this scheme and its aim to protect British citizens while ensuring aid reaches genuine Ukrainian needs.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.