← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Bus Service Improvement Plans: North-west England
09 March 2022
Lead MP
Charlotte Nichols
Warrington North
Lab
Responding Minister
Trudy Harrison
Tags
EmploymentTransportEnergy
Word Count: 9986
Other Contributors: 8
At a Glance
Charlotte Nichols raised concerns about bus service improvement plans: north-west england in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
Will the Minister admit that many areas will not see any transformation funding? Will she provide details on how much local transport authorities in the North West are set to receive?
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
In Warrington and across the North West, millions of people rely on buses for essential travel. Over the last decade, deregulation and a Tory decline have resulted in more than 3,000 bus routes being lost and over 350,000 passenger journeys disappearing. The reduction in services has led to increased air pollution, with over 1,000 deaths annually linked to poor air quality in the Liverpool city region alone. Despite the 'Bus Back Better' strategy promising a great service for everyone everywhere, funding for bus service transformation from £3 billion to £1.2 billion is insufficient, leading to communities being cut off and services potentially being reduced or lost.
Bob Blackman
Con
Harrow East
The Minister has stated that there is not enough money to fund all transformation bids, but the North West should have received a fair share of the £3 billion promised. The reduction in funding is a real concern.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
He promoted the use of advanced technology in buses, such as hydrogen buses from Wrightbus, suggesting they are reliable and could encourage people to switch from cars to public transport.
Justin Madders
Lab
Ellesmere Port and Bromborough
Madders highlighted the inadequacy of public transport in his constituency, noting high reliance on private motor transport and frequent threats to bus services. He cited examples such as rerouting of the No. 7 bus service due to parking issues and closure of the Ellesmere Port police station lacking accessible alternative transport options for those without cars. Madders emphasized the lack of strategic planning and transparency in consultations, leading to reduced accessibility and increased inconvenience for elderly and disabled residents. The Minister recognised the surprise at the ease and affordability of bus services in London; constituents want to know when they will no longer pay twice the fare for half the distance on local buses.
Blackley and Broughton
Discusses the negative impacts of bus deregulation since the 1980s, highlighting the loss of over 200 services in Liverpool city region and advocating for public control through franchising. Raises concerns about funding gaps with only £1.2 billion allocated against a need of more than £7 billion. The Confederation of Passenger Transport suggested that over £7 billion was needed to deliver the measures in bus service improvement plans, but the Government have only allocated £1.2 billion. The authority's ambition for a modern, reliable transport service cannot be met with this funding gap.
Mike Amesbury
Lab
Warrington South
He highlighted the decommissioning of route No. 62 from Runcorn to Warrington, emphasising the importance of reregulation and hoping for a positive outcome in the judicial review. Asks if the hon. Friend agrees that the regulation for resources is vital for a first-class affordable public transport system.
Paul Maynard
Lib Dem
Blackpool North and Cleveleys
The Liberal Democrats support measures such as zero-emission buses, but oppose the introduction of a new licensing regime for bus operators. The focus should be on providing quality services rather than on regulation.
Sam Tarry
Lab
Ipswich
Expressed disappointment in the Government's ambition for bus services, citing underfunding and inadequate statutory framework leading to declining bus coverage. Highlighted the disparity in fares across different regions, with some areas seeing fares as high as an hour's wage for a worker.
Yasmin Qureshi
Lab
Bolton South and Walkden
She provided an example of a constituent's daily commute involving multiple bus changes, often leading to delays or cancellations that result in job loss, illustrating the concerning situation for many people. On funding, in Bolton we need £30 million; otherwise one third of all buses will be cut. That will impact my constituency massively. Proper funding is so important. Notes the issue of affordability in her constituency where two sets of bus providers on the same route charge different fares, causing confusion for constituents.
Government Response
Trudy Harrison
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Nokes, and to hear the appreciation of and ambition for buses and public services, particularly in the north-west. The Government are committed to supporting bus services with over £3 billion of new funding for buses over this Parliament, including £1.2 billion for transformational bus service improvements, more than £500 million for zero-emission buses, and more than £500 million for city region sustainable transport settlements. This funding will bring about significant changes such as the roll-out of 32 electric buses in Greater Manchester and 120 battery-electric buses in Warrington over the next few months. The Government's national bus strategy aims to make buses more frequent, reliable, easier to understand and use, better coordinated, and cheaper through measures like low flat fares and daily price caps. Authorities will submit draft versions of their enhanced partnership plans and schemes to the DFT by the end of April this year. The Department is also working on improving access for disabled people and introducing multi-operator contactless capped fares within each local transport authority area. Additionally, funding has been allocated for staff capacity and capability measures in local transport authorities and the bus industry.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.