← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Merseyside: Funding of Local Authorities
08 February 2022
Lead MP
Margaret Greenwood
Wirral West
Lab
Responding Minister
Neil O'Brien
Tags
Culture, Media & SportLocal Government
Word Count: 9329
Other Contributors: 9
At a Glance
Margaret Greenwood raised concerns about merseyside: funding of local authorities in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities should provide emergency funding to prevent further reductions in public services and hold a meeting with Wirral MPs to discuss the situation. The Minister should also update on plans for a multi-year settlement from 2023-24.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Local authorities in Merseyside have experienced severe funding cuts from the central government, with Wirral Council seeing an 85% reduction in Government funding between 2010 and 2020. This has resulted in significant financial pressures, including proposals to close Woodchurch leisure centre and swimming pool and numerous libraries, which are essential for community health and education.
Angela Eagle
Lab
Wallasey
Wirral has faced severe budget cuts, with a 53% real-terms reduction in government funding since 2010. This has led to significant staffing reductions and service cuts, leaving residents paying more in council tax for fewer services. Angela Eagle criticised the Government's local finance settlement as unsustainable and called for relief from further cuts. Responded with frustration, saying 'Oh, come on!'
George Howarth
Lab
Knowsley
The levelling-up funding is politically skewed, with wealthier areas receiving ten times more than the poorest. Knowsley, one of the most deprived boroughs in England, received no funding while Central Bedfordshire received £90 per head despite being far less deprived. George Howarth asked how the Minister can justify this allocation and sought assurances that Knowsley will receive support for its town centre regeneration.
Kim Johnson
Lab
Liverpool Riverside
Kim Johnson highlighted the severe budget cuts in Liverpool over the past decade, praising local councillors and officers for their efforts despite limited resources. He noted that Liverpool is the third most deprived local authority in England with in-work poverty at record levels and child poverty increasing rapidly. Johnson criticised the government's levelling up programme as another broken promise and pointed out the discrepancy between soaring energy bills and profits of companies like Shell, while councils face a £34 million cut. He urged for multi-year funding settlements to provide stability and phase out bid funding culture.
Maria Eagle
Lab
Liverpool Garston
Maria Eagle highlighted the severe impact of austerity cuts on Knowsley borough council, stating that it has lost over £100 million and faces an average loss of £485 per person compared to a national average of £188. She noted that Knowsley is ranked as one of the most deprived areas in England and suffers from high levels of fuel poverty and rising costs of living. Asked if the Minister would give way to discuss a specific point.
Marie Rimmer
Lab
St Helens South and Whiston
The areas represented by Knowsley and St Helens have had their budgets eviscerated over the past decade, leading to greater hardship for communities that still struggle from job losses. Less well-off areas do not raise as much council tax or business rates as wealthier ones, making it hard for them to catch up.
Mick Whitley
Lab
Birkenhead
Mr Whitley thanked the hon. Friend for raising the issue of Woodchurch leisure centre and swimming pool in Birkenhead, highlighting its importance as a community asset serving some of the poorest communities in the area with worse health outcomes compared to more affluent areas. Mick Whitley discussed the dire situation facing Birkenhead, noting that it ranks among the top 1% for deprivation nationally. He highlighted proposed cuts to youth services and libraries, as well as funding reductions affecting essential community projects like the Hive youth zone. Asked if the Minister would give way to discuss the closure of libraries in Birkenhead.
Mike Amesbury
Lab
Newtonabbey
The speaker expressed concern about the £27 million of additional austerity imposed on Wirral and highlighted cuts to libraries, leisure centres, and golf courses. He cited a 50% real-terms cut in funding for every Merseyside local authority since 2010 and criticised the levelling-up White Paper as lacking new money and vague targets.
Tom Hunt
Lab
Wirral South
The Member supports the lead MP's stance, highlighting the importance of preserving Woodchurch leisure centre and swimming pool in areas with higher percentages of people with long-term health conditions.
Paula Barker
Lab
Liverpool Wavertree
Councils are being forced to increase council tax precepts while making deep cuts to local services, with Liverpool City Council facing a £34 million revenue gap this financial year. The degradation of local government finances since 2010 has exacerbated geographical inequalities and limited the potential of communities in Merseyside.
Government Response
Neil O'Brien
Government Response
The Government will provide an additional £3.7 billion to councils in England through the local government finance settlement for the next year, increasing local authority funding by more than 4.5% in real terms compared with the previous year. Core spending power for Merseyside's authorities is set to increase by at least 7.7%, above the average cash increase across England of 7.4%. The Government has also committed £2.6 billion from the UK shared prosperity fund and provided Liverpool city region with over £500 million in funding for transport networks and town deals.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.