← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Leamside Line — [Mr Philip Hollobone in the Chair]
08 February 2022
Lead MP
Sharon Hodgson
Washington and Gateshead South
Lab
Responding Minister
Wendy Morton
Tags
TransportBenefits & WelfareMental Health
Word Count: 12732
Other Contributors: 9
At a Glance
Sharon Hodgson raised concerns about leamside line — [mr philip hollobone in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
Hodgson urges the Government to support the reopening of the Leamside Line for national, regional, and local purposes. She requests financial assistance and cooperation from the government to make this project a reality, emphasizing its importance for levelling up the north-east and improving transport infrastructure.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Sharon Hodgson is concerned about the lack of connectivity in Washington and its surrounding areas. She highlighted that the area, home to over 70,000 residents, has been disconnected from rail services since 1992 due to the mothballing of the Leamside Line. The MP emphasized the negative impact on local communities with limited car ownership (40%) and insufficient public transport options, leading to social isolation and economic challenges. Washington is identified as one of the largest conurbations in the UK without rail or rapid transit links.
Chi Onwurah
Lab
Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West
I congratulate my hon. Friend on bringing this important debate. The Leamside line would give people from across the region access to Newcastle institutions, enhancing economic interconnectivity and critical mass.
Kate Osborne
Lab
Jarrow and Gateshead East
She highlighted the lack of investment in rail infrastructure in South Tyneside and Gateshead, stating that the Leamside line closure for over three decades has hindered job opportunities and economic growth. She cited figures showing London received more than double the transport spending per capita compared to the north-east in 2019-20, with £877 spent per head in London versus around £300 per head in the north-east.
Kevan Jones
Lab
Blyth Valley
Mr Jones highlighted the cross-party and community support for reopening the Leamside line, criticizing the government's exclusion of the project from their integrated rail plan. He argued that Transport North East's comprehensive transport plans were being undermined by vague promises of future city region deals without proper funding or devolution. He pointed out inefficient use of funds like the Beeching reversal fund and criticized the £640 million feasibility study for extending the Tyne and Wear metro to Consett, which exceeds the entire budget allocated for such projects. Commented on the underinvestment in rail infrastructure and highlighted the loss of £224 million funding for Durham County Council since 2010, leading to cuts in bus services. Why is the Government linking this vital investment to rejigging their arrangements for the region when there is no need? The Minister has not answered the question and continues to talk about co-operation, but the region is already doing that. There is unanimity and leadership among all councils and partners in the region now.
Liz Twist
Lab
Blaydon and Consett
I thank my hon. Friend for securing this really important debate and joining the hon. Member for Sedgefield at Follingsby to show unity on proceeding with the Leamside line.
Mary Glindon
Lab
Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend
I congratulate my hon. Friend on securing this debate, expressing the real problem for people in our area: if they do not have a car, their employment opportunities are significantly reduced due to lack of public transport.
Paul Howell
Con
Sleaford and North Hykeham
I thank the hon. Lady for giving way again. Does she agree that the Leamside line has the potential to provide resilience to the east coast main line? Reopening the Leamside line is crucial for levelling up in the north-east, offering historical significance and economic benefits. It would enhance local transport connectivity, boost employment, and attract private investment. The current rail infrastructure at Ferryhill is inadequate, with nearly 35% of the population relying on slow buses without access to cars or vans. Mr Howell also highlighted that reopening Ferryhill station could serve as a catalyst for wider Leamside line restoration.
Peter Gibson
Con
Barnard Castle
My constituency has received massive investment, and reopening the Leamside line would open up job opportunities in Darlington for her constituents. Stressed the need for improved rail infrastructure in the north-east to level up and enhance connectivity. Highlighted £105 million investment in Bank Top station, the potential benefits of the Leamside line, and support for a feasibility study into restoring the Darlington to Weardale line. Asked the hon. Lady to outline why the last Labour Government did not deem it necessary to reopen the Leamside line.
Richard Holden
Con
Basildon and Billericay
Emphasised the importance of the Darlington station changes for the Weardale line, advocating for a package approach that includes the Leamside line to expand capacity in the north-east. Mr Holden praised the Leamside line for its potential to improve transport infrastructure in the north-east, supporting levelling-up initiatives. He noted that the project would enhance capacity on the east coast main line, facilitate direct rail transit for freight, and enable people to access employment and education opportunities more easily.
Tan Dhesi
Lab
Slough
Dhesi praised the cross-party support for reopening the Leamside line and highlighted its economic benefits, noting that every local journey contributes £8.50 to the north-east economy. He criticised the lack of progress on the project despite widespread support from businesses, councils, and transport authorities. Dhesi also expressed disappointment over the absence of the Leamside line in the integrated rail plan and called for investment in the east coast main line corridor.
Government Response
Wendy Morton
Government Response
The Government is committed to levelling up the UK economy through improved transport connectivity, investing over £29 billion in the north since 2010. The integrated rail plan for the north and midlands includes a £96 billion investment focused on enhancing inter-city connections and east-west links. Regarding the Leamside line, the Government acknowledges its potential but considers reopening it as part of any future city region settlement. Ongoing studies by Transport North East aim to develop a new business case for the South Tyneside and Wearside metro loop. The minister highlighted other rail schemes benefiting the north-east, including the Northumberland line reopening project with £34 million investment and station developments like Horden. Network Rail's improvements on the east coast main line, Sunderland station redevelopment, Tyne and Wear Metro extension, and fleet replacement grants for Nexus are also mentioned.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.