← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Levelling Up: East of England
18 January 2022
Lead MP
Peter Aldous
Waveney
Con
Responding Minister
Neil O'Brien
Tags
Social CareTaxationBusiness & TradeBenefits & WelfareLocal Government
Word Count: 14141
Other Contributors: 16
At a Glance
Peter Aldous raised concerns about levelling up: east of england in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
Aldous asked for assurances from the Minister that the east of England will not be overlooked in the Government's levelling-up strategy. He requested seedcorn funding for offshore wind and nuclear power projects to transform coastal East Anglia economically while addressing adult social care funding gaps and improving transport infrastructure.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Peter Aldous highlighted that the east of England is relatively prosperous but contains significant pockets of hidden deprivation, particularly in coastal and rural areas such as Lowestoft. He cited a 2019 study which found over 12,000 people in Lowestoft affected by income deprivation with 68% economically active adults but 15.7% on universal credit. Aldous noted that while the east of England is one of three net contributing regions to UK plc, there are concerns about the region's adult social care funding and infrastructure investment needs.
Alex Norris
Lab Co-op
Nottingham North and Kimberley
The MP appreciated the debate initiated by the hon. Member for Waveney, highlighting the need to address regional disparities in the east of England. He stressed the importance of understanding how data can be skewed at different levels, ensuring communities are not left behind despite their top-line economic performance. The MP also expressed frustration over bidding rounds that pit communities against each other and do not provide a comprehensive settlement for all stakeholders. He emphasised the need to adopt an 'all-regions' approach rather than framing levelling up as north versus south. Additionally, he pointed out the East of England Local Government Association's concern about 40% less funding being allocated compared to other areas.
Andrew Selous
Con
South West Bedfordshire
The hon. Member is pleased about the £19.9 million for a new community wellbeing centre hub in Houghton Regis but expresses concern over infrastructure development to support the 14,000 homes being built in his area. He highlights that GP capacity per 10,000 registered patients in south Bedfordshire is only 4.5 and direct patient care roles stand at 1.6 FTEs. The hon. Member calls for a solution to ensure general practice capacity matches housing development.
Chris Loder
Con
Westbourne
Chris Loder acknowledged the need for investment in Lowestoft's infrastructure, including the Gull Wing bridge and flood defence scheme. He emphasised that while Lowestoft is set to benefit from freeports at Felixstowe and Harwich, there are concerns about overlooking priority areas like Lowestoft which face deep pockets of deprivation.
Clive Lewis
Lab
Norwich South
Acknowledged the hon. Gentleman's contribution and questioned whether a 20th-century model of transport infrastructure is suitable given the climate crisis, suggesting rapid transit systems to move people off roads onto public transportation. Lewis argued for a 21st-century, sustainable economy and criticised the competitive nature of existing devolution deals. He also highlighted the opposition to infrastructure projects like the Wensum link in Norwich. The hon. Member criticised the government's approach to infrastructure development, highlighting a road project that bulldozed through an ecologically sensitive area and rejected less damaging alternatives.
Daniel Zeichner
Lab
Cambridge
He thanked the hon. Member for Waveney for his thorough introduction and highlighted the work of all-party parliamentary groups in keeping regional issues alive. He noted that despite years of discussion, solutions often fail to materialise, citing a previous three-county system proposal. Zeichner pointed out funding discrepancies once London's impact is excluded, emphasising the need for a detailed understanding of regional challenges. He asked about East West Rail and the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford arc progress, Ely junction's importance in unlocking freight issues, improvements to the West Anglia main line, and bus service cuts due to impending covid funding expiration.
Duncan Baker
Con
North Norfolk
Mr. Baker highlighted that the 'levelling up' initiative is not just about levelling up the north but also about equality throughout the UK, especially in regions like the east of England which are already economically successful and could benefit from marginal investment. He emphasised the need for more medical, social care workers, mental health practitioners, and green job investments in his constituency of North Norfolk.
Gagan Mohindra
Con
South West Hertfordshire
Levelling up is about empowering communities to help themselves and includes improving transport, broadband, education, health, and high streets. Mr Mohindra highlighted poor mobile signal and broadband in his affluent village Belsize. He also discussed the importance of community support for local businesses and healthcare provision despite not having an acute hospital locally. He mentioned that around 10,000 people use public transport to work daily, stressing the need for better local transport provision to retain residents within their communities.
Agreed with my hon. Friend's point about transport infrastructure but noted that some leafier suburbs do not benefit from such projects, advocating for measures to ensure economic vitality through better transportation networks. The hon. Member asks about the A12 but no specific information is provided in his brief intervention. The speaker emphasized the need to address deprivation in coastal areas within the East of England, highlighting specific issues such as housing and funding disparities.
Jerome Mayhew
Con
Broadland and Fakenham
He intervened briefly to comment on the popularity of a proposed road improvement in Norfolk. The hon. Member discussed the importance of connectivity for rural areas, focusing on mobile phone coverage and superfast broadband as key elements for economic growth in the east of England.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Congratulated the hon. Gentleman on attendance and mentioned that consideration must be given to levelling up in other parts of the UK, noting disparities such as £38 per head in the north of England compared to less funding for Northern Ireland.
Matthew Hancock
Con
West Suffolk
He strongly supported the levelling-up agenda in the east of England, highlighting the need for infrastructure improvements and enterprise support. He also emphasised the importance of devolution to enhance local opportunities. He highlighted the noticeable improvement in digital connectivity across his constituency, noting that almost all areas now have better access. He emphasised the importance of completing this work and mentioned the strong support for a devolution deal to unlock further potential in Suffolk.
Mohammad Yasin
Lab
Bedford
The hon. Member expresses disappointment that his constituency did not receive levelling-up funding despite strong economic and social case, while neighbouring areas received £26.7 million. He criticises the Government's levelling-up agenda for being disjointed and lacking strategic purpose, suggesting a need for clear priorities, road map and timeline.
Rachel Hopkins
Lab
Luton South and South Bedfordshire
Ms Hopkins criticised the Government's levelling-up strategy as underfunded and not addressing inequalities. She pointed out that the eastern region received the second-lowest per capita spend in the UK, with Luton suffering cuts to local services since 2010. Ms Hopkins also highlighted the need for full redevelopment of Luton's train station to truly regenerate the town. The hon. Member intervenes to point out that under the last 10 years of Government's levelling-up agenda, people have been forced away from towns like Luton due to unaffordable housing.
Richard Fuller
Con
North Bedfordshire
Expressed concern that the east of England may be seen primarily as an area for house building and raising taxes rather than receiving investment, highlighting parallel aspects of levelling up that affect Bedfordshire.
Acknowledged deprivation in coastal communities but pointed out that new towns also have some of the most deprived wards in the east of England, emphasizing the need for levelling up both opportunity and environments to keep people in their local communities. Highlighted the importance of digital connectivity in South Essex and proposed considering a tram network along the A127, which provides vital routes out of London through busy areas with levelling-up potential.
Tom Hunt
Ind
Ipswich
Mr. Hunt expressed concern about the mix of deprivation and potential in his constituency, advocating for investment in education, crime prevention, and infrastructure. He highlighted the success of Ipswich's £25 million town deal but also pointed out failures such as not securing an institute of technology bid or a pilot status for the local skills improvement plan. He argued that Suffolk receives an unfair funding share compared to other regions when it comes to core public services like education and policing.
Government Response
Neil O'Brien
Government Response
The Minister thanked the Member for Waveney for securing the debate and addressed concerns about levelling up in the east of England. He highlighted that total public spending in the east of England rose from £49.7 billion to £78.25 billion between 2016-17 and 2020-21, a 57% increase. He mentioned various funding streams such as the levelling-up fund, town deals, future high streets fund, and community renewal fund, totalling over £400 million. The Minister also discussed road investments like the A14 upgrade (£1.5 billion) and digital connectivity improvements, including Project Gigabit investment of £233 million for 60% gigabit-capable broadband coverage in the region.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.