← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme — [Rushanara Ali in the Chair]

06 January 2022

Lead MP

Jim Shannon
Strangford
DUP

Responding Minister

Victoria Atkins

Tags

TaxationEmploymentForeign Affairs
Word Count: 14002
Other Contributors: 9

At a Glance

Jim Shannon raised concerns about afghan citizens resettlement scheme — [rushanara ali in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Shannon requested that the Government reconsider a four-year timeframe for the resettlement scheme, arguing that it is not justifiable when lives are at stake. He urged for more clarity on eligibility criteria and a faster application process to help vulnerable Afghans escape imminent danger.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Strangford
Opened the debate
Jim Shannon expressed gratitude for the Afghan citizens resettlement scheme and acknowledged the Government's efforts. However, he is deeply concerned about the urgency of the situation faced by religious and ethnic minorities in Afghanistan, such as Hazaras, Christians, Ahmadi Muslims, Baha'is, and Humanists. The Taliban's control has led to increased persecution and violence against these groups. Shannon cited Amnesty International's report highlighting the risks faced by Hazara Muslims and mentioned specific incidents involving targeted killings and torture.

Government Response

Victoria Atkins
Government Response
May I say what a pleasure it is to serve under your chairmanship on your first outing, Ms Ali? Well chaired, if I may make that observation. I congratulate the hon. Member for Strangford (Jim Shannon) on securing this important debate. We understand the concerns and are trying everything we can to work with countries outside of Afghanistan to find safe routes. The Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme includes three pathways: those already evacuated in the UK, individuals who faced risks during evacuation, and a UNHCR route for people at risk who supported the UK and international community efforts. Funding for British nationals is not permitted under an Act from 2002, but their families will be supported under the ACRS. We are supporting those who were evacuated in Kabul and want to support them further. The third pathway covers those who are at risk and have supported the UK or international community, including staff from GardaWorld. Colleagues across the House have asked about British Council contractors, Chevening alumni, and more, and we plan to honour commitments to those at risk in these groups. We are working closely with countries in the region to find safe routes for Afghans, managing relationships with respect and exploring every avenue. I am grateful to colleagues who set out important details, such as senior judges needing protection. Eligible British nationals include those evacuated from Afghanistan by UK military or NATO countries during Operation Pitting. We want to continue caring for them and their families. The community sponsorship scheme is being reviewed and expanded based on the Canadian model. Funding instructions are in place, and if there are issues, my officials will pursue matters with chief executives.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.