← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

British Sign Language — [Esther McVey in the Chair]

17 October 2023

Lead MP

Chloe Smith
Norwich North
Con

Responding Minister

Tom Pursglove

Tags

Children & Families
Word Count: 12143
Other Contributors: 7

At a Glance

Chloe Smith raised concerns about british sign language — [esther mcvey in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Minister must ensure that the Act's guidance improves public service communications and accessibility, sets targets for Departments, and responds to feedback from deaf communities. Additionally, he should update on progress with the advisory board, improving Access to Work services for deaf users, and how tandem legislation will enable legal redress.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Norwich North
Opened the debate
The Government's BSL Act is necessary to address decades of exclusion faced by deaf people in the UK. The inaugural report revealed concerning gaps, such as zero usage of BSL in public announcements and policy changes. There are also issues with access to family sign language support being a postcode lottery, inadequate digital BSL services leading to financial difficulties for some individuals, and limited signing provision in hospitals.

Government Response

Tom Pursglove
Government Response
The Minister acknowledges the cross-party support for the British Sign Language Act 2022 and emphasizes ongoing efforts to improve BSL usage across government departments. He discusses judicial reviews related to BSL interpretation, progress on health services using BSL, and commitments to annual reporting and five-year plans within each department. The minister also notes a public consultation on the BSL GCSE and commits to publishing guidance promoting the use of British Sign Language.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.