← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Freehold Estate Management Fees — [Dr Rupa Huq in the Chair]

13 July 2023

Lead MP

Helen Morgan
North Shropshire
Lib Dem

Responding Minister

Rachel Maclean

Tags

HousingAgriculture & Rural AffairsStandards & Ethics
Word Count: 10100
Other Contributors: 4

At a Glance

Helen Morgan raised concerns about freehold estate management fees — [dr rupa huq in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Government should legislate to ensure freeholders have rights equivalent to leaseholders when challenging management fees. They must also address the lack of adoption by local councils for communal areas and roads, provide guidance on preventing conflicts of interest in conveyancing services, and include cost-effective remedies in the upcoming leasehold reform Bill.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

North Shropshire
Opened the debate
The management of freehold estates often involves unfair and unregulated fees that are imposed on residents, sometimes leading to exorbitant charges for maintenance work that is subcontracted at inflated costs. In North Shropshire, examples include the Brambles development where sewage issues led to five-figure repair charges. Many developers fail to complete necessary infrastructure or take out required agreements, leaving residents with extensive financial burdens and stress without proper legal recourse.

Government Response

Rachel Maclean
Government Response
Discussed the need for transparency in estate management fees, introduced legislation aimed at protecting freehold homeowners, and highlighted existing routes to redress such as the new homes ombudsman service. Mentioned the intention to include a Bill addressing these issues in the King's Speech.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.