← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights: Overseas Aid
12 July 2023
Lead MP
Sarah Champion
Rotherham
Lab
Responding Minister
Andrew Mitchell
Tags
Women & Equalities
Word Count: 4251
Other Contributors: 2
At a Glance
Sarah Champion raised concerns about sexual and reproductive health and rights: overseas aid in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The lead MP asks the Minister to commit to restoring support for the UNFPA's core operating fund alongside existing commitments to their supplies partnership and to spend £500 million annually on SRHR programming and supplies for the next three years. She also requests a commitment from the UK Government to invest in the Family Planning 2030 initiative.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The UK's cuts to overseas aid have significantly impacted sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) services globally. The reduction in funding has led to a decrease in access to contraception, an increase in unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortions, and maternal deaths. Marginalised groups face additional barriers in accessing SRHR services due to stigma, discrimination, and lack of infrastructure. In 2021, UK aid to UNFPA's supplies partnership was cut by 85%, leading to immediate cuts in commodities provided, such as contraception. The most marginalised communities are disproportionately affected by these funding reductions.
Daniel Poulter
Con
Stourbridge
Thanked the hon. Member for securing the debate and raised concerns about high maternal and newborn mortality rates in low and middle-income countries, particularly in Africa, urging suggestions on how Britain can better support this agenda through its aid strategy.
Theo Clarke
Con
Lincoln
Thanked the hon. Lady for securing the debate and agreed that the Government are right to commit spending on women and girls, especially maternal mental health. Called for a UK voluntary national review on sustainable development goals.
Government Response
Andrew Mitchell
Government Response
It is a tremendous pleasure to serve under the chairmanship and respond to the debate on sexual and reproductive health and rights overseas aid. The minister acknowledged the work of the hon. Member for Rotherham in securing the debate and highlighted the importance of the International Development Committee's role. He addressed the challenges faced by women and girls globally, emphasizing Britain's commitment to promoting and protecting their rights through diplomatic efforts with allies and multilateral partners.
The minister discussed the impact of reduced overseas development assistance (ODA) budgets due to the COVID-19 pandemic and other crises, noting that while the budget has been cut from 0.7% to 0.5%, efforts are being made to enhance and augment taxpayers' money through multipliers. The UK continues to support sexual and reproductive health rights with a significant portfolio of programmes and policies, including FP2030, the Global Financing Facility, the Women's Integrated Sexual Health Programme, and initiatives to end the AIDS epidemic.
He mentioned that the UNFPA supplies partnership has received more than £200 million from the UK since 2019 for life-saving reproductive health products. The minister also highlighted the need for sustainable financing through domestic investment commitments by recipient countries, emphasizing the importance of integrating sexual and reproductive health into broader health systems strengthening work.
The final part of the response reiterated the Government's focus on reducing maternal mortality, addressing roll-backs in SRHR and women's rights, securing sustainable financing, and advocating for marginalized populations. The minister concluded by stressing that Britain's aims in international development are driven by a commitment to girls and women's empowerment, particularly through education, family planning, and combating sexual violence.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.