← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Rosebank Oilfield: Environmental Impacts

28 June 2023

Lead MP

Caroline Lucas
Brighton, Pavilion
Green

Responding Minister

Graham Stuart

Tags

EmploymentClimateEnergyBusiness & Trade
Word Count: 4789
Other Contributors: 5

At a Glance

Caroline Lucas raised concerns about rosebank oilfield: environmental impacts in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Government should review its approach to oil and gas licensing, scrap the investment allowance for fossil fuels, withdraw from the energy charter treaty, and stop Rosebank's development.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Brighton, Pavilion
Opened the debate
Approving the Rosebank oilfield would release over 200 million tonnes of carbon dioxide, which is more than combined annual emissions of all low-income countries. The project does not align with climate targets and could harm marine ecosystems.

Government Response

Graham Stuart
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Robertson. I congratulate the hon. Member for Brighton, Pavilion on securing this important debate. The Minister highlighted the achievements of the Climate Change Committee in driving climate action and noted significant reductions in emissions since 1990. He stated that development proposals for oilfields like Rosebank are subject to rigorous regulatory processes by the North Sea Transition Authority and Offshore Petroleum Regulator for Environment and Decommissioning, which include extensive environmental impact assessments and public consultations. The Minister emphasized that while the UK is committed to net zero emissions by 2050, it remains heavily dependent on fossil fuels currently, with oil and gas production being crucial for national security and job creation. He argued against policies proposed by opposition parties, stating they would lead to higher imports of liquefied natural gas with greater emission intensity, loss of jobs, revenue for the Exchequer, and hinder transition towards cleaner energy technologies.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.