← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Public Bodies and VAT

17 May 2023

Lead MP

George Eustice
Camborne and Redruth
Con

Responding Minister

Victoria Atkins

Tags

EconomyTaxationEmployment
Word Count: 7846
Other Contributors: 7

At a Glance

George Eustice raised concerns about public bodies and vat in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

I invite the Minister to commit to introducing a statutory instrument under section 33 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 to ensure fair treatment for FE colleges. This would provide a small but significant financial respite (estimated 2-4%) that could be used immediately to retain and recruit staff.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Camborne and Redruth
Opened the debate
FE colleges are treated unfairly under the Value Added Tax Act 1994 compared to other public bodies such as schools. This is particularly problematic for FE colleges as they struggle with higher costs due to practical skill courses like electrical engineering, bricklaying and construction which require hands-on teaching. The current tax rules prevent FE colleges from reclaiming VAT on their inputs, placing them at a disadvantage compared to schools.

Government Response

Victoria Atkins
Government Response
Celebrated the UK's rise in international education league tables, discussed government investments in further education including £300 million investment before end of previous financial year to eliminate funding deficit for FE colleges, provided an additional £150 million allocation of capital grant funding in current financial year. Explained VAT schemes for public bodies and mentioned cost of allowing FE colleges to join section 33 scheme at £200 million annually.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.