← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Farming on Dartmoor — [Stewart Hosie in the Chair]

18 April 2023

Lead MP

Geoffrey Cox
Torridge and Tavistock
Con

Responding Minister

Mark Spencer

Tags

Agriculture & Rural Affairs
Word Count: 11117
Other Contributors: 9

At a Glance

Geoffrey Cox raised concerns about farming on dartmoor — [stewart hosie in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Cox called on the Minister to support an independent facilitation process to review the contesting arguments and balance the competing public interests. He also urged the Government to design environmental land management schemes tailored to upland areas that incentivize practices beneficial for both Natural England's objectives and preserving viable farm businesses.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Torridge and Tavistock
Opened the debate
Farmers on Dartmoor face significant challenges due to Natural England's proposed changes to higher level stewardship arrangements, which would require complete removal of winter grazing and a dramatic reduction in summer grazing levels. This sudden announcement without consultation has caused uncertainty and stress among farming communities that depend on the moor for their livelihoods. Geoffrey Cox emphasized the importance of preserving the cultural and social heritage associated with hefted flocks and Dartmoor ponies, which are at risk if winter grazing is eliminated entirely.

Government Response

Mark Spencer
Government Response
Acknowledged farming as essential to communities on Dartmoor and committed to support farmers through an independent evidence review of ecological conditions on designated sites. Emphasized the importance of considering solutions carefully to avoid negative impacts on local communities.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.