← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

London Zoo Lease

14 March 2023

Lead MP

Bob Blackman
Harrow East
Con

Responding Minister

Julia Lopez

Tags

EconomyTaxationWomen & Equalities
Word Count: 6246
Other Contributors: 5

At a Glance

Bob Blackman raised concerns about london zoo lease in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Blackman requested the government to extend the lease for London Zoo to 150 years, either through supporting his private Member's Bill or by amending existing legislation. He emphasized the importance of providing certainty on the lease length to attract global investment and improve facilities for both scientists and animals.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Harrow East
Opened the debate
Bob Blackman expressed concern about the financial and operational challenges facing London Zoo due to its current lease limit of 60 years under the Crown Estate Act 1961. He highlighted that this short lease period hinders the zoo's ability to raise funds, create new partnerships, expand support programmes for local communities, and invest in site regeneration. The speaker noted that many buildings on the site are listed and require modernisation, which is crucial for sustaining the zoo's role as a leading conservation organisation.

Government Response

Julia Lopez
Government Response
Stated the Government's commitment to finding a legislative vehicle for extending London Zoo's lease, highlighting its historical significance, economic impact (£24 million annually), and role in conservation. Acknowledged the zoo's current challenges due to the pandemic and noted plans to modernise animal spaces with naturalistic multi-species zones. Emphasised the importance of accessibility schemes and education initiatives for school students.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.