← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

South West Water: Performance — [Sir George Howarth in the Chair]

28 February 2023

Lead MP

Simon Jupp

Responding Minister

Rebecca Pow

Tags

EconomyAgriculture & Rural Affairs
Word Count: 9408
Other Contributors: 5

At a Glance

Simon Jupp raised concerns about south west water: performance — [sir george howarth in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Jupp calls on South West Water to invest more in infrastructure and urges the Minister to ensure that water companies maintain monitors and fix faults immediately. He also asks for better transparency about progress on reducing storm overflow discharges and for financial penalties to be used effectively as a deterrent.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Opened the debate
Simon Jupp is concerned about the excessive sewage and rainwater ending up in rivers and seas due to storm overflow discharges. He mentions that South West Water's infrastructure cannot cope with the growing population and heavier storms, leading to poor water quality. The company has been relying too much on storm overflows without addressing underlying issues and has a one-star rating for environmental performance by the Environment Agency.

Government Response

Rebecca Pow
Government Response
Thanked East Devon MP for raising the issue of South West Water's performance and acknowledged the serious concerns about its environmental impact. Discussed data on pollution incidents, storm sewage overflows, leakage rates, and positive actions being taken by South West Water such as the £45 million WaterFit project. Highlighted government initiatives to improve monitoring and enforcement through regulatory measures, including fines for non-compliance, and plans for future investments in water infrastructure improvements.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.