← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Leaseholders and Managing Agents
28 February 2023
Lead MP
Barry Gardiner
Brent West
Lab
Responding Minister
Lee Rowley
Tags
HousingStandards & Ethics
Word Count: 8977
Other Contributors: 11
At a Glance
Barry Gardiner raised concerns about leaseholders and managing agents in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The MP asks for an end to new residential long leases on houses, restrictions on ground rents to a peppercorn, improved transparency for leaseholders, enforcement of existing laws against unreasonable service charges, and the abolition of the current leasehold system.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The MP is concerned about the unfair treatment of leaseholders due to fire safety issues and unscrupulous managing agents. He cited specific examples where residents faced unreasonable service charges, such as a 256% increase in insurance premiums at Williams Way and a 130% increase at Lawns Court. The MP also highlighted that many leaseholders are facing financial penury and severe impacts on their mental and physical health due to the inability to manage or buy freehold rights over their properties.
Andy Carter
Lab
Warrington South
Andy Carter welcomed the initial leasehold reform but expressed concerns about ongoing issues faced by constituents in Warrington South, including escalating service charges and difficulties in accessing information. He highlighted specific cases where residents have been trapped in leasehold properties for years, facing high fees and lack of transparency from freeholders. Mr Carter invited Mr Pennycook to meet leaseholders in Warrington South facing issues, suggesting direct engagement before final legislation is proposed.
Apsana Begum
Lab
Poplar and Limehouse
Ms Apsana Begum provided an example where a constituent paid £1,000 in electricity bills for a one-bedroom flat, raising concerns about the ability to change account types due to bureaucratic hurdles set by managing agents. She also mentioned that building defects often go unnoticed as there is no incentive for developers or appointed managers to highlight them within warranty periods.
Florence Eshalomi
Lab Co-op
Vauxhall and Camberwell Green
Ms Eshalomi highlighted the plight of leaseholders due to managing agents' practices, citing a constituent facing a service charge increase from £1,000 to over £30,000 without proper justification. She noted that this situation is common and described how managing agents often withhold critical information from leaseholders despite the responsibility for fire safety issues falling on freeholders.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Congratulates the hon. Member for securing the debate and agrees that current arrangements leave leaseholders at the mercy of unscrupulous agents, advocating for fit-for-purpose regulation to protect average leaseholders from unfair charges.
Justin Madders
Lab
Ellesmere Port and Bromborough
Mr. Justin Madders highlighted several issues faced by leaseholders, including the lack of regulation in managing agents and property managers, which often results in inflated service charges and insurance costs. He cited an example where a block of flats' insurance company operated from the same address as the managing agents and freeholder, raising concerns about conflicts of interest. Additionally, he pointed out that residents are double-charged for communal services through both council tax and service charge.
Greenwich and Woolwich
Mr Pennycook acknowledged the importance of regulating managing agents and reforming the leasehold system. He highlighted that while there are good managing agents, many leaseholders suffer from poor service and exploitation. The Government's failure to implement recommendations from a 2019 report has led to financial burdens for homeowners due to inflation and the building safety crisis.
Mike Amesbury
Lab
Worcester
I thank my hon. Friend for securing the debate and suggests that it is time to abolish rather than polish the leasehold system.
Munira Wilson
Lib Dem
Twickenham
Munira Wilson mentioned two cases in her constituency involving managing agents wrongly commissioning fire safety assessments for buildings under 18 metres, leading to residents being trapped with unnecessary charges of up to £800,000.
Peter Bottomley
Con
Worthing West
I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for introducing this debate and point out that it is not just traditional landlords, but some great charities such as Wellcome, who have had to go to court to get judgments which should have been made by Parliament.
Stevenage
Asks whether the hon. Member agrees that Railpen and other agents have caused a terrible impact on leaseholders' mental health across the country, highlighting issues in Stevenage and Southampton, Itchen. Mr McPartland emphasised the mental, physical and financial strain faced by leaseholders due to unsafe buildings. He acknowledged progress made through the Building Safety Act 2022 but criticised ongoing delays in implementing fixes for known issues, such as at Vista Tower in Stevenage.
Tom Hunt
Lab
King's Lynn and West Norfolk
Agrees with the hon. Member that rogue agents and freeholders believe they can act with impunity, and it is important to ensure regulations are in place to hold them accountable and penalise immoral behaviour.
Government Response
Lee Rowley
Government Response
Thanking hon. Members for their contributions, Lee Rowley committed to abolishing marriage value at the earliest opportunity and improving service charge transparency in leasehold reform. He addressed concerns about managing agents by committing to reducing bad practice proportionately and reasonably. On building safety, he discussed ongoing work with lenders to improve market functionality and insurance issues, referencing meetings with the Association of British Insurers for a potential solution. Lee Rowley also expressed willingness to visit specific cases of high charges and engage further on these important issues.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.