← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Eating Disorders Awareness Week

28 February 2023

Lead MP

Wera Hobhouse
Bath
Lib Dem

Responding Minister

Maria Caulfield

Tags

NHSScience & TechnologyMental Health
Word Count: 13250
Other Contributors: 9

At a Glance

Wera Hobhouse raised concerns about eating disorders awareness week in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Government should implement Hope Virgo's manifesto to develop an evidence-based national eating disorder strategy, integrate obesity prevention plans, reform treatment approaches, and provide better training for medical professionals. The Minister is urged to address waiting time targets for adult services similar to those for children's services and ensure that additional funding reaches frontline mental health services. Services must invest in early intervention and emergency support without choosing between them. More training is needed for all healthcare professionals, including pharmacists. There should be a fully funded access and waiting time standard for adults as exists for children. A treatment pathway specifically for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder needs to be commissioned through the NHS.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Bath
Opened the debate
An estimated 1.25 million people in the UK have an eating disorder, with a third at risk of suicide and anorexia having the highest mortality rate among mental illnesses. The debate highlighted that men are also significantly affected, with one person in four being male, and 89% of young men worrying about their appearance. There is a lack of research funding, toxic stereotypes, misunderstanding of eating disorders as a lifestyle choice, and inconsistent treatment availability across different regions. Waiting times for treatment have increased, and there has been an 84% rise in hospital admissions over five years, with disproportionate increases among boys and young men. NHS eating disorder services in Sheffield are failing patients due to a four to five-month waiting list for SYEDA services, which is deterring people from seeking help. Since 2015, referrals have increased every year. The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman concluded that urgent action is needed if the Government are to prevent more deaths. NHS figures show an 84% increase in hospital admissions for eating disorders in the last five years, with over 8,000 adults waiting for therapy.

Government Response

Maria Caulfield
Government Response
Improving treatment for eating disorders is a key priority for the Government. Beat estimates that 1.25 million people live with an eating disorder in the UK, and the stigma around these conditions, especially for men, must be addressed. The Minister highlighted the £1 billion investment under the NHS long-term plan to enhance community mental health care, including eating disorders. She also mentioned that funding has increased by £53 million per year since 2016 for children and young people's community eating disorder services. Over 4,000 more young people entered treatment in the previous year due to additional investment of £79 million in young people's mental health services as part of the £500 million covid recovery plan funding. The Government aims to set targets for adults' eating disorders services as well and is consulting on this matter. Rejection of treatment based on BMI criteria should not occur, according to NICE guidance. Restraint used during in-patient treatments was addressed by introducing legislation in 2018. The Minister committed to using evidence-based medicine and encouraging research into eating disorders, particularly for men and high-risk groups. Local commissioners are expected to use allocated funds effectively to address regional needs.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.