← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Open Season for Woodcock
27 February 2023
Lead MP
Jonathan Gullis
Responding Minister
Trudy Harrison
Tags
TaxationBusiness & Trade
Word Count: 12052
Other Contributors: 11
At a Glance
Jonathan Gullis raised concerns about open season for woodcock in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The Secretary of State should introduce statutory measures to push back the start date for the shooting season to December 1st, which would not require primary legislation and could be an effective step towards protecting the woodcock population.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
The resident British woodcock population is declining sharply. A survey in 2013 found only 55,000 breeding pairs in the UK, a significant decline from 78,000 pairs estimated in 2003. The current shooting season runs from October to January and includes many native birds before the winter migration of European and Asian woodcocks arrives. Wild Justice and the RSPB argue that shortening the hunting season would help protect the declining population.
Alex Sobel
Lab Co-op
Leeds Central and Headingley
The UK woodcock population is declining, with resident woodcock being particularly threatened. The petition requests delaying the shooting season to protect these birds through their breeding season. A national survey in 2013 found 55,000 male woodcocks, but numbers are believed to have declined since then.
Bill Wiggin
Con
North Herefordshire
The plural of woodcock is woodcock, and the voluntary ban on using lead shot has not been completed yet. Mr. Wiggin highlighted the importance of habitat in maintaining woodcock populations, suggesting that shooting is not the primary issue. He mentioned that 10% of the estimated 1.6 million migrant woodcock arriving in the UK are shot each year and questioned why this does not lead to a decline in wild populations globally. Asked whether climate change should be considered before setting anything in legislation regarding the woodcock shooting season.
David Simmonds
Con
Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner
Emphasised the importance of considering both the woodcock population and broader wildlife issues in the UK. Mentioned climate change's impact on bird habitats and highlighted the role of habitat management for pheasant shooting. Argued that voluntary actions have been beneficial and further regulation might not be necessary.
James Davies
Con
Westbury
The shooting community already has voluntary restraint measures and is actively managing habitats to protect woodcock populations. Changes to the hunting season should be considered alongside other conservation efforts such as deer management and habitat restoration.
Duncan Baker
Con
North Norfolk
The Member for North Norfolk highlighted the importance of protecting breeding woodcock populations due to severe declines. He noted that approximately 55,000 pairs remain in the UK and up to 100,000 are shot annually, indicating another dramatic decline. Duncan Baker argued that woodcock, unlike game birds like pheasants, are not a substantial food source or pest, and suggested limiting the shooting season as an initiative to support this red list species.
Greg Smith
Con
Mid Buckinghamshire
Mr. Smith questioned the necessity of new legislation, emphasizing that the shooting community is already responsible and focused on conservation. He cited statistics showing an annual migration of between 1.4 million and 1.6 million woodcock to the UK, with the IUCN red list classifying the species as one of least concern. He argued against restrictions on shooting due to its economic benefits and contribution to wildlife habitats.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Jim Shannon, a country sports enthusiast and conservationist, highlighted the positive impact of shooting on habitat creation for birds like woodcocks. He mentioned that shooting contributes £2.4 billion to the UK economy annually and provides 3.9 million workdays in conservation efforts each year. He argued against regulatory changes, stating there is no evidence that shooting has a detrimental impact on woodcock populations and voluntary restraint measures are already effective.
Kerry McCarthy
Lab
Bristol East
There is an all-party parliamentary group on lead ammunition which I co-chair; Bill Wiggin would be welcome to join. Kerry McCarthy questioned why a voluntary approach is sufficient when shooting organisations accept that shooting woodcock before 1 December is wrong.
Laura Kelly
SNP
West Dunbartonshire
Wild Justice's petition highlights the need for urgent action to protect woodcocks, with figures showing that nearly half of woodcocks are shot before December. The SNP supports pushing back the start date of the shooting season.
Olivia Blake
Lab
Sheffield Hallam
She expressed support for the petition signed by 370 of her constituents and highlighted that the native woodcock population has reduced by 19% in the last decade. She called for proactive measures to protect and extend habitats, such as moving the open season for woodcock to December. Olivia also questioned the Government's progress towards planting 30,000 hectares of woodland per year and the need to increase tree-planting capacity.
Robert Goodwill
Con
Hindley
Mr Goodwill acknowledged his role in introducing the petitions system and discussed the importance of scientific research for wildlife conservation. He highlighted that shooting practices have positive ecological impacts, such as supporting ground-nesting birds like woodcock. He noted declining populations due to factors including global warming, habitat degradation by deer, and predation from raptors. Mr Goodwill also mentioned high levels of voluntary compliance with delayed start dates for the hunting season. Mr. Goodwill supported Mr. Wiggin's argument, citing the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds' practice of predator control as an example of managing wildlife to protect certain species.
Government Response
Trudy Harrison
Government Response
Acknowledged the decline of woodcock and broader environmental concerns, noting contributions from Members about game value. Highlighted measures in the Environmental Improvement Plan 2023 to improve habitat and conservation for various species. Emphasised the importance of understanding how to make the supply chain for game meat like venison more accessible and sustainable. Noted Natural England's review of evidence before making a science-led decision on woodcock shooting season.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.