← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Open Season for Woodcock

27 February 2023

Lead MP

Jonathan Gullis

Responding Minister

Trudy Harrison

Tags

TaxationBusiness & Trade
Word Count: 12052
Other Contributors: 11

At a Glance

Jonathan Gullis raised concerns about open season for woodcock in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Secretary of State should introduce statutory measures to push back the start date for the shooting season to December 1st, which would not require primary legislation and could be an effective step towards protecting the woodcock population.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Opened the debate
The resident British woodcock population is declining sharply. A survey in 2013 found only 55,000 breeding pairs in the UK, a significant decline from 78,000 pairs estimated in 2003. The current shooting season runs from October to January and includes many native birds before the winter migration of European and Asian woodcocks arrives. Wild Justice and the RSPB argue that shortening the hunting season would help protect the declining population.

Government Response

Trudy Harrison
Government Response
Acknowledged the decline of woodcock and broader environmental concerns, noting contributions from Members about game value. Highlighted measures in the Environmental Improvement Plan 2023 to improve habitat and conservation for various species. Emphasised the importance of understanding how to make the supply chain for game meat like venison more accessible and sustainable. Noted Natural England's review of evidence before making a science-led decision on woodcock shooting season.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.