← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Overseas Aid: Child Health and Education

22 February 2023

Lead MP

Matt Rodda
Reading Central
Lab

Responding Minister

David Rutley

Tags

Ukraine
Word Count: 8503
Other Contributors: 7

At a Glance

Matt Rodda raised concerns about overseas aid: child health and education in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The MP asks the Government to reassess their approach to overseas aid, including a return to the 0.7% target for development spending as soon as financially possible and to focus on where Britain can make a difference through strategic partnerships with local communities and developing countries. I ask the government to immediately reinstate the 0.7% target on overseas aid as it is both morally responsible and economically smart, ensuring continued support for international development projects that save lives and promote stability around the world.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Reading Central
Opened the debate
The MP is concerned about the negative impact of reduced overseas aid on child health and education in developing countries. He highlighted that bilateral aid for education fell from £789 million in 2019 to just £545 million in 2020, a reduction of nearly a third, affecting programmes such as those run by Dhaka Ahsania Mission which serves out-of-school children and the anonymous NGO working on child rights. He also mentioned that the UK's pledge for the Global Partnership for Education is lower than expected and the funding cut has led to 1,250 children without access to quality non-formal primary education in Bangladesh. I am concerned about the scale of aid cuts, particularly in Lebanon, Ethiopia, Yemen, Malawi, Kenya, India, and Uganda. In Malawi, BRACED funding was cut from £25 million to £5 million, resulting in early warning system failures during Tropical Storm Ana, which displaced 84,000 people and caused a cholera outbreak affecting 1,160 children with 184 deaths. The cuts impact education for women and girls, HIV treatment programmes, and research supporting teachers and students in crisis areas.

Government Response

David Rutley
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Mr Bone, and I am sorry that the shadow Minister was cut off. The UK's aid budget currently sits at around 0.5% of gross national income, equating to over £11 billion in 2021. Despite economic challenges from the pandemic and Russia's attack on Ukraine, we remain one of the world's biggest aid donors. Extra funding of £2.5 billion has been provided by the Treasury for official development assistance over two years (£1 billion in 2022-23 and £1.5 billion in 2023-24). Our decisions on spending are guided by the international development strategy, focusing on priorities like women and girls and global health. We have been able to respond to emergencies such as a cholera outbreak in Malawi with £500,000 of funding. The UK continues to support work through multilateral organisations and we remain committed to protecting the most vulnerable, aiming to return to spending 0.7% of GNI on ODA as soon as possible. Health remains a key priority for our development assistance, with commitments such as £340 million core voluntary commitment to the World Health Organisation, £1.5 billion to improve nutrition, and £1.65 billion support to Gavi's mission between 2021-2025. We also pledged an additional £1 billion to the Global Fund for HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria prevention. Our work supports global education, prioritising programmes that give direct support to children's learning while mitigating budget reductions through reprofiling or delaying spend.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.