← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
EU Funding: Northern Ireland
01 February 2023
Lead MP
Claire Hanna
Belfast South and Mid Down
SDLP
Responding Minister
Dehenna Davison
Tags
Northern IrelandForeign AffairsBusiness & TradeStandards & EthicsLocal Government
Word Count: 5046
Other Contributors: 1
At a Glance
Claire Hanna raised concerns about eu funding: northern ireland in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
Claire Hanna asked how the Department ensures that funded projects align with Northern Ireland's democratically agreed priorities in the absence of a formal role for those Departments, and requested clarity on future funding decisions and criteria. She also questioned whether any additional considerations were applied to funding decisions and if the criteria were consistent across all projects.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Claire Hanna expressed concerns about the loss of EU funding for Northern Ireland, particularly noting that during the EU referendum campaign there were assurances that Northern Ireland would not lose out from funds based on need. She highlighted issues with process, strategy, coordination, and transparency in the allocation of the community renewal fund and shared prosperity fund (SPF). Hanna pointed out that Northern Ireland was a net beneficiary of EU funding which was necessary to address capital underinvestment, high rates of economically inactive people, and difficulties attracting quality investment. The average annual loss from ESF/ERDF funding is £65 million for Northern Ireland, while the SPF allocation is only £127 million over three years. She cited specific examples such as the NOW Group and Mencap to illustrate the impact on local organisations and services.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Jim Shannon thanked Claire Hanna for bringing the debate forward and expressed his support for her concerns. He mentioned the East Belfast Mission, noting that without funding it will struggle to continue its successful work in Strangford. Shannon also highlighted an environmental scheme at Conlig that missed out on EU funding despite being shovel-ready. Asked how much of the new deal money has been used or set aside. Questioned whether projects were additional to existing ones and raised concerns about transparency and equality screening under section 75.
Government Response
Dehenna Davison
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under the chairmanship today, addressing the debate on EU funding for Northern Ireland. The Minister thanked Claire Hanna for securing this important debate and acknowledged her commitment to organisations in Belfast South that have previously benefited from or relied heavily on EU funding. She outlined the UK shared prosperity fund (UKSPF), which will match the funding allocated to Northern Ireland through EU structural funds, providing £126.8 million of new funding up to March 2025, and reaching £74 million in 2024-25. The Minister mentioned that a comprehensive programme of workshops and engagement was run with Northern Ireland partners last year to tailor the funding appropriately. An investment plan was published before Christmas setting out how Northern Ireland's allocation will be spent, supporting key needs such as addressing economic inactivity and promoting entrepreneurship. She highlighted the first competition for £42 million aimed at helping economically inactive people into work and expressed hope that other Northern Ireland Executive Departments would participate fully in the design and delivery of the fund.
The Minister also addressed concerns about transitioning from EU programmes, stating that funding has been reprofiled to better reflect funding needs. She referred to various other funds supporting growth, regeneration, and investment in Northern Ireland, including city and growth deals covering every part of Northern Ireland with £617 million invested. The Minister confirmed a commitment to round 3 of the levelling-up fund but noted that decisions are yet to be made on its details.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.