← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Bus Services: England — [Valerie Vaz in the Chair]

21 May 2024

Lead MP

Jonathan Gullis

Responding Minister

Guy Opperman

Tags

Transport
Word Count: 11954
Other Contributors: 5

At a Glance

Jonathan Gullis raised concerns about bus services: england — [valerie vaz in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Gullis asked Stoke-on-Trent City Council to scrap the 9:30 am cap on concessionary bus passes and called on the Minister to join him in this campaign. He also advocated for an £11 million investment from the council to support a new electric bus fleet.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Opened the debate
Jonathan Gullis highlighted the importance of buses in connecting communities, especially in Stoke-on-Trent North, Kidsgrove and Talke. He noted that bus services have shrunk by an estimated 14% nationally between 2016-17 and 2021-22, with a 50% reduction in Stoke-on-Trent over the same period due to changes in timetables rather than route closures. Gullis reported that 76% of local residents surveyed would use buses more for shopping if better services were available, and 49.6% said services could be improved by running later into the evening.

Government Response

Guy Opperman
Government Response
The Government have doubled bus funding since 2010 and announced over £4.5 billion in support to improve services, including over £33 million for Stoke-on-Trent City Council. He highlighted the local affordable fares scheme and zero-emission buses funded by HS2 money. Guy Opperman also mentioned that Liverpool City Council received £9.4 million for zero-emission buses.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.