← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Illegal Immigration: Costs

07 May 2024

Lead MP

Andrea Jenkyns
Morley and Outwood
Con

Responding Minister

Tom Pursglove

Tags

Asylum & RefugeesMigrants & BordersTaxationForeign Affairs
Word Count: 13395
Other Contributors: 3

At a Glance

Andrea Jenkyns raised concerns about illegal immigration: costs in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

I urge the Government to take immediate action: strengthen border security, get tougher on international partners, streamline immigration processes, impose stricter penalties for smugglers, implement public awareness campaigns, and leave the European Convention on Human Rights or hold a referendum to let the public decide. The economic costs of illegal migration are staggering; the Government's impact assessment estimates that providing public services to an illegal migration population of 1.2 million could cost £14.4 billion. I would like the Minister to address these issues and provide concrete steps to reduce the number of illegal immigrants. The Minister should share the annual cost of keeping 40,000 asylum seekers in indefinite limbo, confirm the number of detention spaces reserved for migrants due for deportation to Rwanda, and publish his risk assessment on the possibility of large-scale absconding by asylum seekers.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Morley and Outwood
Opened the debate
I am concerned about the rising costs of illegal immigration for the economy and wider society. The Home Office figures reveal that irregular border crossings have skyrocketed, with smugglers now preferring to conduct amphibious assaults on our borders rather than using other routes. Of the 16,510 small boat migrants to land in Britain from 2018 up to the second quarter of 2021, just 317 arrived with a passport; that is just 1.92%. The total number has since risen to nearly 120,000 people since 2018. Home Office figures show that 94% apply for asylum and the refusal rate for asylum applications at initial decision has plummeted from 88% down to an astonishing 24% in 2022; three quarters of those refused at initial decision between 2004 and 2021 lodged an appeal, with a third of those appeals being successful. I am worried that the asylum system is broken down and unfit for purpose, being exploited on an unprecedented scale. The costs of the asylum system have skyrocketed from £500 million a year under Labour to £5.4 billion under the Conservative Government, with an additional £576 million spent on sending 300 asylum seekers to Rwanda at almost £2 million per deportee. Boat crossings are up 33% this year, and there is a record backlog of over 100,000 cases.

Government Response

Tom Pursglove
Government Response
The Government's Home Secretary is leading the international conversation about what more can be done to tackle migratory flows in a coordinated and joined-up way. The minister acknowledges that illegal immigration is unfair, unsafe, unsustainable, and costly. He highlighted the Government's efforts to secure sanctuary through resettlement schemes and maintain a fair migration system while addressing the challenges posed by illegal migration. The Minister mentioned recent measures such as the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 and the Illegal Migration Act 2023 which have been opposed by opposition parties. He discussed the significant costs incurred, stating that £8 million is spent daily accommodating people in the asylum system and the need to close hotels housing migrants. The Minister emphasized the importance of international cooperation, mentioning a three-year funding deal with France worth £475 million aimed at deploying personnel and technology to prevent illegal crossings. Additionally, he highlighted efforts such as supporting Libya's ability to stop people risking their lives to reach Europe and co-funding projects in Tunisia to assist voluntary returns. The minister also addressed the Rwanda policy, asserting that despite legal challenges, the government remains committed to operationalizing it to deter dangerous crossings. He noted a reduction of 90% in Albanian arrivals as evidence of deterrent effectiveness. The Minister further outlined plans for faster processing of asylum claims and increasing judicial capacity through additional judges and trained first-tier tribunal judges sitting in upper tribunals. Overall, the minister conveyed that the government's comprehensive approach is yielding results but more work remains to put criminal gangs out of business.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.