← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Free School Meals — [Mr Clive Betts in the Chair]

07 May 2024

Lead MP

Munira Wilson
Twickenham
Lib Dem

Responding Minister

Damian Hinds

Tags

NHSEducationTaxationEmploymentWomen & EqualitiesMental HealthLocal Government
Word Count: 13029
Other Contributors: 12

At a Glance

Munira Wilson raised concerns about free school meals — [mr clive betts in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Liberal Democrats want the government to extend free school meals to all children in poverty and ensure every child who is entitled to them actually receives them. They also propose making changes like auto-enrolment to increase take-up rates, improve nutritional quality of meals, and fund increases that keep up with inflation.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Twickenham
Opened the debate
The Liberal Democrats are worried about children going hungry at school and the impact on their health, education, and well-being. Stories of children hiding in playgrounds or eating non-food items due to lack of food highlight the issue. Statistics show that 20% of households with children reported experiencing food insecurity in January 2024, and over 900,000 children miss out on free school meals despite living in poverty. Parents face impossible choices when trying to feed their children, as seen by a mother skipping her mental health medication to afford food for her daughter.

Government Response

Damian Hinds
Government Response
It is a great pleasure to see you in the Chair, Mr Betts. I join colleagues in congratulating the hon. Member for Twickenham on securing this important debate. The Government are determined to ensure that every child, regardless of their background, has the best start in life, and nutrition and school meals are important in that. Not only do they support the development of healthy eating habits that can pave the way to lifelong wellbeing, but they help pupils to concentrate, learn and get the most from their education in the immediate term. The Department for Education spends more than £1.5 billion annually on policies to deliver free and nutritious food to children and young people; that is on food provision alone. On top of that, we allocate money to schools to support the education and opportunity of disadvantaged children that is driven by their free-school-meal status, such as through the pupil premium and the deprivation factor in the national funding formula. I am proud that this Government have extended eligibility for free school meals more than any other. We spend over £1 billion per annum delivering free lunches to the greatest ever proportion of school children: over a third. This change is despite unemployment being down by a million, more than 600,000 fewer children being in workless households since 2010 and the proportion of people in low hourly pay having halved since 2015. Overall, more than 2 million pupils are eligible for benefits-related free school meals. In addition, as we have just been discussing, 1.3 million infants in reception, year 1 and year 2 get a free meal under the universal infant free school meals policy, which was introduced in 2014. Further to that, more than 90,000 disadvantaged students in further education receive a free meal at lunchtime. We have also introduced extensive protections, which have been in effect since 2018. They ensure that any child eligible for free school meals will retain their entitlement and keep getting free meals until the end of the phase—in other words, until the end of primary or secondary—even if their family's income rises above the income threshold such that this would otherwise have stopped. We continue to support the provision of breakfast by investing up to £40 million in the national school breakfast programme. This funding supports up to 2,700 schools in disadvantaged areas and means that thousands of children from low-income families are offered a free, nutritious breakfast to better support their attainment, wellbeing and readiness to learn. Further to that, we recognise that nutrition does not cease to be an issue outside of term time, and that holiday periods can be particularly difficult for disadvantaged and low-income families. That is one reason why we continue to support the delivery of enriching activities and provision of nutritious food through the holiday activities and food programme, which has been backed by more than £200 million in funding and now sees all 153 local authorities in England taking part. The success of the programme is plain to see. Since 2022, it has provided 11.3 million HAF—holiday activities and food—days to children and young people in this country. Across 2023, more than 5 million HAF days were provided during Easter, summer and winter delivery. In response to the hon. Member for York Central, there is a degree of flexibility for individual school provision for eligibility for that facility. We recognise that pursuing policies that facilitate work and create jobs is the single most important poverty-tackling policy that a Government can have. Colleagues, including the hon. Members for Twickenham and for Washington and Sunderland West, brought up the important question of auto-enrolment. We want to make it as simple as possible for schools and local authorities to determine eligibility and for families to apply. That is why we have the eligibility checking service. I am also aware of some of the innovative things local authorities are doing to look at auto-enrolment, which we will look at closely. Historically, it has not been straightforward to achieve auto-enrolment, but it is definitely something we want to study further and learn from. We have done what we committed to do: update guidance in that area, particularly regarding children with disabilities, to make clear the duty to make reasonable adjustments under relevant legislation.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.