← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Financial Conduct Authority: Accountability
01 May 2024
Lead MP
Alistair Carmichael
Orkney and Shetland
Lib Dem
Responding Minister
Bim Afolami
Tags
Crime & Law EnforcementEconomyEmploymentParliamentary Procedure
Word Count: 3852
Other Contributors: 4
At a Glance
Alistair Carmichael raised concerns about financial conduct authority: accountability in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The Minister should address staff pay issues, cost of living adjustments, staff representation, outdated performance grading models, and the disability pay gap in correspondence.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The FCA failed to act on warning signs in a Ponzi scheme case, leading to multiple victims losing hundreds of thousands of pounds. Constituents faced significant legal costs and compensation limits. Staff morale is poor, with many earning below the minimum living standard. The performance assessment framework is outdated and unfair, causing a toxic work environment.
Chris Bryant
Lab
Rhondda
Highlights parallels with Post Office cases where denial tactics are used, making it difficult for constituents to get justice. Emphasises the importance of financial services regulation for public trust.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Jim Shannon wholeheartedly endorses the concerns raised. He believes that the FCA is often perceived as a barrier rather than help for ordinary individuals, and calls for a significant change in how the FCA engages with constituents.
Nigel Adams
Con
Selby and Ainsty
Agrees that the FCA is not working for anyone and expresses relief at the MP's presence to discuss these issues.
Wendy Chamberlain
Lib Dem
North East Fife
My right hon. Friend is outlining a very concerning story. Wendy Chamberlain agrees that the Financial Conduct Authority's legislative authority for ensuring changes on access to cash deserves attention, as it affects communities' ability to access cash. Ms Chamberlain expressed concern about the impact of banks leaving towns and the need for larger financial institutions to be held accountable to ensure vulnerable communities have access to cash.
Government Response
Bim Afolami
Government Response
It is a pleasure to be here. I thank the right hon. Member for Orkney and Shetland (Mr Carmichael) for raising this extremely important issue for debate. The Government agree that accountability for financial services regulators is of utmost importance, balancing independence with clear accountability, democratic input, and transparent oversight. The FCA is operationally independent but accountable to Parliament and the Treasury. Last summer, new secondary objectives were set to facilitate international competitiveness and economic growth while retaining protection of safety and soundness. The minister believes the FCA should rethink its 'naming and shaming' proposals. Regarding access to cash, the expected timeframe for the FCA's consultation on this issue is the third quarter of 2023. On the failure of Midas Financial Solutions, the FCA intervened in 2014 following intelligence related to the scheme, leading to compensation through the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and Mr Alistair Greig being charged with fraud. The minister emphasizes that it is vital for the FCA to continue robust enforcement against fraudulent activity and maintain high standards across all supervised firms using a risk-based approach. The FCA's accountability includes annual reports, regular data publication on performance, and scrutiny by Parliament through committees like the Treasury Committee and House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee. Despite multiple methods of accountability, streamlining is necessary to ensure effectiveness. Between December 2019 and March this year, the FCA provided oral evidence to Select Committees 36 times. The minister reassures that legislative frameworks balance independence with proper accountability and commits to monitoring the FCA's progress through upcoming reports.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.