← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Partner and Spousal Visas: Minimum Income

23 April 2024

Lead MP

Paul Blomfield
Sheffield Central
Lab

Responding Minister

Tom Pursglove

Tags

ImmigrationMigrants & BordersEmploymentStandards & Ethics
Word Count: 13450
Other Contributors: 12

At a Glance

Paul Blomfield raised concerns about partner and spousal visas: minimum income in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The MP asks the Government to review their policy on spousal migration rules and consider fairer approaches. He suggests suspending planned increases for this year and 2025 until a comprehensive review is conducted.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Sheffield Central
Opened the debate
The MP is concerned about the Government's approach to migration policy, particularly regarding partner and spousal visas. He highlights that the minimum income threshold changes announced in December have significant consequences for families, with many unable to afford the £29,000 threshold required for a visa extension. The impact assessment has not been published, raising questions about transparency. Additionally, the MP notes that certain professions such as nurses and teachers fall below these thresholds, disproportionately affecting young people, women, minorities, and those in lower-income regions like Yorkshire and the Humber.

Government Response

Tom Pursglove
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under the chairmanship of Sir George Howarth. I congratulate Paul Blomfield on securing this debate, acknowledging it as an important issue with varied opinions from Members. The minister highlights that net migration in the year to June 2023 was estimated at 672,000 and stresses the need for decisive action to bring it down by tightening rules on care workers and skilled workers, ensuring support for family members being brought over. He argues that the policy will address the injustice of a system enabling employers to recruit cheap labour from overseas at the expense of British workers while putting unsustainable pressure on public services. The minister emphasises that seeing 120,000 dependants come with 100,000 care workers is unsustainable. He mentions tackling illegal migration and passing legislation to combat criminal gangs involved in people smuggling, noting tragic consequences this morning. The decision to raise the Minimum Income Requirement (MIR) to £38,700 per year aligns with the aim of a high-wage, high-skill economy. The minister states that the MIR will prevent migrant partners from accessing public funds until they achieve settlement status. He notes ongoing workstreams with the Migration Advisory Committee on several fronts and highlights implementing the MIR increase incrementally without applying it retrospectively. Additionally, he mentions granting permission when to do otherwise would breach an applicant's article 8 right under the European convention on human rights. The minister concludes by asserting that reducing net migration numbers is a Government responsibility.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.